Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1743 citing documents.

State v. Punnett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Osgood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Osgood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Herndon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Herndon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Andersen 531 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Andersen 531 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Groves Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Groves Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Kemp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Kemp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
§ 13-402.” ¶ 20 (2005) (“[A] defendant must establish both that fundamental error exists and that the error in his case caused him prejudice.”).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
We review that order for an abuse of discretion, see State v. Buccheri–Bianca, ¶ 16 (App. 2013); and because Johnson’s counsel objected to the amendment, we review for harmless error, ¶ 18 (2005).
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Zavala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Zavala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
at 144 ¶ 29 ( ¶ 27 (2005)).
State v. Perez Agueda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Perez Agueda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶7 “Reviewing courts consider alleged trial error under the harmless error standard when a defendant objects at trial and thereby preserves an issue for appeal.” ¶ 18 (2005).
State of Arizona v. Brian Matthew MacHardy 521 P.3d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State of Arizona v. Brian Matthew MacHardy 521 P.3d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
¶¶ 19-20 (2005); Escalante
State v. McShea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. McShea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Schmitz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Schmitz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Daniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Daniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Castaneda 517 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Castaneda 517 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 18 (2005) (citations omitted).
State v. Villegas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Villegas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Dominick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Dominick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶20 Even assuming both of White’s pre-Miranda statements should have been suppressed,3 he does not establish reversible error because his post-Miranda statement was properly admitted, and the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that admission of the pre-Miranda statements “did not contribute to or affect the verdict or sentence.” ¶ 18 (2005).
State v. Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ruedas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by