Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1723 citing documents.

State v. Cleveland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Dulin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 21 (2018) (-68, ¶¶ 19-20 (2005)).
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gamble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Diamond H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gamble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 19 (2005) ("Fundamental error review .
Diamond H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005); ¶ 21 (2018) (“[T]he first step in fundamental error review is determining whether trial error exists.”).
State v. Curl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Curl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 4 (App. 2008); ¶ 19 (2005).
State v. Epsy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Epsy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Fausto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Fausto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that both goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19–20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that both goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State v. Reidhead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Reidhead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State of Arizona v. Erick Antonio Escalante 425 P.3d 1078 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Erick Antonio Escalante 425 P.3d 1078 Ariz. 2018
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
5 STATE v. FIGUEROA Decision of the Court ¶19 Although Figueroa’s failure to object limits our review to fundamental error, ¶ 19 (2005), a violation of double jeopardy constitutes fundamental error, ¶ 4 (App. 2008).
State v. Ponce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ponce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Calderon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Calderon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Montes Flores 428 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Montes Flores 428 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-68, ¶¶ 19-20 (2005); ¶ 23 (2009) (violations of Rule 13.5(b) "do not fall into [the] category" of structural error).
State of Arizona v. Jason Eugene Bush 423 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2018
State v. Ayonayon 428 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ayonayon 428 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See State v. Henderson , , 567, ¶ 19, , 607 (2005).
State of Arizona v. Jason Eugene Bush 423 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2018
¶35 Although we generally review a trial court's voir dire rulings for abuse of discretion, State v. Patterson , , 273 ¶ 5, , 4 (2012), fundamental error review applies to Bush's constitutional claims because he did not raise them at trial, State v. Henderson , , 567 ¶ 19, , 607 (2005) (noting that "[a] defendant who fails to object at trial forfeits the right to obtain appellate relief except in those rare cases" involving fundamental error).
Thomas M. v. Danette G., G.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Thomas M. v. Danette G., G.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Antwine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Antwine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Suazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by