Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1743 citing documents.

State v. Britton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Petty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Petty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 18 (2005) ("Reviewing courts consider alleged trial error under the harmless error standard when a defendant objects .
State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 21 (2018) (citation omitted) ( ¶ 26 (2005)).
State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Structural errors “affect the entire conduct of the trial from beginning to end, and thus taint the framework within which the trial proceeds.” ¶ 12 (2005) (citations and internal quotations omitted).
State v. Garnica Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Garnica Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 19 (2005) (failure to object to alleged trial error results in fundamental error review); -35, ¶ 4 (App. 2008) (objection at trial on a ground other than the one asserted on appeal does not preserve issue for appeal).
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶15 Woods did not object in superior court to admission of the 2015 conviction; thus, he is entitled to relief only if he can establish fundamental error.4 ¶ 19 (2005).
State v. Kellywood 433 P.3d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Kellywood 433 P.3d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
See State v. Henderson , , ¶¶ 19-20, (quoting State v. Hunter , , 90, , 982 (1984) ) (fundamental error is "error going to the foundation of the case ...
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-62, ¶¶ 10-11, 13 (2007) (absence of colloquy not prejudicial if convictions may be proved by other uncontested evidence in the record); -59, ¶¶ 11-12 (App. 2013); ¶ 26 (2005).
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cleveland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Dulin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cleveland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Dulin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 21 (2018) (-68, ¶¶ 19-20 (2005)).
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gamble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Diamond H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Gamble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 19 (2005) ("Fundamental error review .
Diamond H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005); ¶ 21 (2018) (“[T]he first step in fundamental error review is determining whether trial error exists.”).
State v. Curl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Curl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 4 (App. 2008); ¶ 19 (2005).
State v. Epsy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Epsy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Fausto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Fausto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that both goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19–20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that both goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State v. Reidhead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Reidhead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State of Arizona v. Erick Antonio Escalante 425 P.3d 1078 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Erick Antonio Escalante 425 P.3d 1078 Ariz. 2018
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
5 STATE v. FIGUEROA Decision of the Court ¶19 Although Figueroa’s failure to object limits our review to fundamental error, ¶ 19 (2005), a violation of double jeopardy constitutes fundamental error, ¶ 4 (App. 2008).
State v. Ponce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018