Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. GUNCHES, 234 P.3d 590.
- State of Arizona v. Edward Littleton McCauley Ariz. 2026
- State v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- State v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- State of Arizona v. Preston Alton Strong 555 P.3d 537 Ariz. 2024
-
State of Arizona v. Preston Alton Strong
555 P.3d 537
Ariz. 2024
State v. Gunches (“Gunches I”), ¶¶ 13–14 (2010).
- Carson v. Hon. gentry/state 553 P.3d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Carson v. Hon. gentry/state
553 P.3d 197
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
P. 11.1(a)(2); ¶ 9 (2010).
- State v. Knisley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Knisley
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“Substantial evidence is such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 14 (2010) (cleaned up).
- State v. Cawthon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- State v. Cawthon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- State of Arizona v. Rahim Muhammad 513 P.3d 1095 Ariz. 2022
-
State of Arizona v. Rahim Muhammad
513 P.3d 1095
Ariz. 2022
¶ 11 (2010) (explaining the standard for a gray-area defendant to waive counsel is “an issue we need not decide here”).
- State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson 509 P.3d 1023 Ariz. 2022
- State of Arizona v. Dwandarrius Jamar Robinson 509 P.3d 1023 Ariz. 2022
- Sarah P., Michael M. v. Dcs, V.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Sarah P., Michael M. v. Dcs, V.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
State v. Hill
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See, e.g., Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975); Ariz. R. Crim.
- State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
-
State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith
475 P.3d 558
Ariz. 2020
We will uphold the jury’s verdict if it is supported by substantial evidence, and we “view[] the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury 24 STATE V. SMITH Opinion of the Court verdict.” ¶¶ 13–14 (2010) (quoting Roque, 213 Ariz. at 218 ¶ 93).
- State V, Threadgill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State V, Threadgill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State of Arizona v. John Michael Allen Ariz. 2020
- State of Arizona v. John Michael Allen Ariz. 2020
- State v. Ibeabuchi 461 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Ibeabuchi 461 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- In Re: Ms2009-000010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
In Re: Ms2009-000010
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 12 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 14 (2010)).
- State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson Ariz. 2019
- State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson Ariz. 2019
- Aaron L. v. Dcs, S.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Aaron L. v. Dcs, S.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State of Arizona v. Dauntorian Lydel Sanders 425 P.3d 1056 Ariz. 2018
-
State of Arizona v. Dauntorian Lydel Sanders
425 P.3d 1056
Ariz. 2018
State v. Gunches (Gunches I), ¶ 14 (2010).
- State of Arizona v. Jasper Phillip Rushing Ariz. 2017
-
State of Arizona v. Jasper Phillip Rushing
Ariz. 2017
To resolve this argument, we must “determine whether substantial evidence support[ed] the jury’s finding, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury verdict.” ¶ 14 (2010).
- State of Arizona v. Aaron Brian Gunches 377 P.3d 993 Ariz. 2016
-
State of Arizona v. Aaron Brian Gunches
377 P.3d 993
Ariz. 2016
State v. Gunches (Gunches I), ¶ 26
- State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau 372 P.3d 945 Ariz. 2016
-
State of Arizona v. Mark Goudeau
372 P.3d 945
Ariz. 2016
¶ 14, 26 ¶¶ 18–23, 594 (2010).
- State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Coulter 339 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Coulter 339 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Youngs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Youngs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014