Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. West, 250 P.3d 1188.

680 citing documents.

State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. McFarland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. McFarland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Curl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Curl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ponce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ponce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Montes Flores 428 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Montes Flores 428 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ramos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Dutra 426 P.3d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Dutra 426 P.3d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Braxton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Braxton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Galvez-Galvez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Galvez-Galvez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Berliew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Chavarria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Chavarria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Berliew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶8 We review the superior court’s denial of a Rule 20 motion de novo, and we review to determine “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶¶ 15-16 (2011).
State v. Meeds 421 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Meeds 421 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Suazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-63, ¶¶ 15, 19 (2011); (“[A] judgment of acquittal prior to verdict may be entered only if there is no substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.”); State v., ¶ 22 (App. 1999) (“We will not reverse the trier of fact’s decision if substantial
State v. Suazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Substantial evidence “is such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of [a] defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011) (citations omitted).
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Benderra v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Benderra v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 15 (2011) (noting that sufficiency of the evidence presents a question of law reviewed de novo) ().