Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. West, 250 P.3d 1188.

696 citing documents.

State v. Chavarria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Berliew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶8 We review the superior court’s denial of a Rule 20 motion de novo, and we review to determine “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶¶ 15-16 (2011).
State v. Meeds 421 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Meeds 421 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Suazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-63, ¶¶ 15, 19 (2011); (“[A] judgment of acquittal prior to verdict may be entered only if there is no substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.”); State v., ¶ 22 (App. 1999) (“We will not reverse the trier of fact’s decision if substantial
State v. Suazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Substantial evidence “is such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of [a] defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011) (citations omitted).
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Benderra v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Benderra v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 15 (2011) (noting that sufficiency of the evidence presents a question of law reviewed de novo) ().
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 16 (2011) (quoting Mathers, 165 Ariz. at 66 (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979))).
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Gehon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Gehon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Chandler 418 P.3d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Chandler 418 P.3d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Bruno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Bruno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Substantial evidence is ‘such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Parker, 231 Ariz. at 407, ¶ 70 ( ¶ 16 (2011)).
State v. Dodd 418 P.3d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dodd 418 P.3d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
*958 State v. West , , 562 ¶ 15, , 1191 (2011).
State v. Patino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Nolte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Nolte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re Isaiah A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re Isaiah A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Harden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Harden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramos-Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramos-Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017