Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. West, 250 P.3d 1188.
- State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Luna
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 16 (2011) (quoting Mathers, 165 Ariz. at 66 (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979))).
- State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Gehon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Gehon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Chandler 418 P.3d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
- State v. Chandler 418 P.3d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
- State v. Bruno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Bruno
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Substantial evidence is ‘such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Parker, 231 Ariz. at 407, ¶ 70 ( ¶ 16 (2011)).
- State v. Dodd 418 P.3d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Dodd
418 P.3d 955
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
*958 State v. West , , 562 ¶ 15, , 1191 (2011).
- State v. Patino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Patino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Nolte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Nolte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- In Re Isaiah A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- In Re Isaiah A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Harden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Harden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Hunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Hunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Ramos-Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Ramos-Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Chevalier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Chevalier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Griffet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Griffet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Stelljes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Stelljes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Young
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 15, 1The Honorable Maurice Portley, Retired Judge of the Court of Appeals, Division One, has been authorized to sit in this matter pursuant to Article VI, Section 3 of the Arizona Constitution.
- State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. MacIas
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 15 (2011) (citing Bible, 175 Ariz. at 595).
- State of Arizona v. Robert Fischer 392 P.3d 488 Ariz. 2017
-
State of Arizona v. Robert Fischer
392 P.3d 488
Ariz. 2017
¶ 18, (“Thus, in ruling on a Rule 20 motion, unlike a motion for a new trial under Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.1(c)(1), a trial court may not re- weigh the facts or disregard inferences that might reasonably be drawn from the evidence.”).
- State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017