Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Arredondo, 746 P.2d 484.

199 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
The prosecutor further stated that “the evidence has proven, even in spite of a specific value [not] being given,” that “the manner in which” the Malibu was totaled, while it “may not be $10,000,” it was “at least $2,000.” ¶45 Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdict, as we are required to do, the photographic evidence and the testimony that the vehicle was “totaled” were sufficient to support the jury’s finding that the damage was at least $2,000 but less than $10,000
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶18 When determining the sufficiency of the evidence, “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011) (cleaned up); (“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omi
State v. Finch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Finch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(noting that we will uphold a verdict unless it "clearly appear[s] that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury"); ¶ 6 (App. 2006) (noting that touching "does not require direct, person-to-person physical co
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Gomes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gomes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence, it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶5 “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted).
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Tingue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Tingue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the 5 STATE v. TINGUE Decision of the Court conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Eznack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Eznack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Conchola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Conchola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Artishon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Artishon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mullener Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mullener Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” ¶ 5 (App. 2012) ().
State v. Heitzmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Heitzmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” ¶ 5 (App. 2012) ().
State v. Wesley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Wesley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
The common scheme or plan may be inferred from circumstantial evidence.” ¶ 46 (App. 2008) ().
State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
We will not set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence unless it “clearly appear[s] that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted).
State v. Lacy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lacy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict and will set it aside only if “upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted).
State v. Donaldson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Donaldson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence[,] it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tamala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear 3 STATE v. ALLEN Decision of the Court that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”