Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Arredondo, 746 P.2d 484.

199 citing documents.

State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
To the contrary, direct and circumstantial evidence are treated the same under Arizona law, and a conspiracy may consist of, and be proven by, circumstantial evidence alone, (“Criminal conspiracy need not be, and usually cannot be, proved by direct evidence.”).
State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence, it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted)).
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(finding a jury verdict will be set aside if under “no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury” (citation omitted)).
State v. Nolte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Nolte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Harden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Harden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Stelljes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stelljes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted).
State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶13 We will not we set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence unless the record clearly demonstrates that under no hypothesis whatsoever “is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Jernigan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Jernigan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence, it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
To set aside a verdict based on insufficient evidence, “it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Valencia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Valencia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(citation omitted); (“[I]t must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted)).
State v. Wayment Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Wayment Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
We will only set aside a conviction for insufficient evidence if it “clearly appear[s] that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted).
State of Arizona v. Usef Latrice Simmons II 363 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Usef Latrice Simmons II 363 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
(“Criminal conspiracy need not be, and usually cannot be, proved by direct evidence.”).
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted).
State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ochoa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ochoa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶12 “Criminal conspiracy need not be, and usually cannot be proved by direct evidence.”
State v. Corrales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Corrales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
State v. Hanss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hanss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015