DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Arredondo, 746 P.2d 484.

199 citing documents.

  • State v. Ocamb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Ocamb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Andrus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Andrus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” -25, - 19 (1976) (“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”).
  • State v. Leyba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Leyba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Dawes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Dawes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence, it must clearly appear that under no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” (citation omitted).
  • State of Arizona v. Armando Pena, Jr. 309 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
  • State of Arizona v. Armando Pena, Jr. 309 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco Borquez 307 P.3d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
  • State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco Borquez 307 P.3d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State of Arizona v. Marcus Deshaun Tucker, Clifton James Cuttler II and Andre Lavelle Armstrong 290 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
  • State of Arizona v. Marcus Deshaun Tucker, Clifton James Cuttler II and Andre Lavelle Armstrong 290 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
    (agreement primary focus of crime of conspiracy, and defendant’s participation therein may be proven by minimal conduct).
  • State of Arizona v. Kwame Roy Lowery 287 P.3d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
  • State of Arizona v. Kwame Roy Lowery 287 P.3d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
    “‘Substantial evidence is proof that reasonable persons could accept as sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Id., (“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”).
  • State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner 280 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2012
  • State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner 280 P.3d 604 Ariz. 2012
  • State of Arizona v. Karama Azizi Mwandishi 278 P.3d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
  • State of Arizona v. Karama Azizi Mwandishi 278 P.3d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
  • State v. Bustamante 274 P.3d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
  • State v. Bustamante 274 P.3d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Bhatt 260 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
  • State v. Flores 260 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
  • State v. Flores 260 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
  • State v. Bhatt 260 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Martinez 245 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
  • State v. Martinez 245 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
  • State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence, it must clearly appear that under no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Fischer 199 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • State v. Fischer 199 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Jensen 173 P.3d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • State v. Jensen 173 P.3d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State of Arizona v. Michael Manuel Dixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
  • State of Arizona v. Michael Manuel Dixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
    (“To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”).
  • State of Arizona v. Cynthia D. Johnson 156 P.3d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
  • State of Arizona v. Cynthia D. Johnson 156 P.3d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
    Stated differently, to warrant reversal, “it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Johnson 111 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
  • State v. Johnson 111 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
    “To set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.”
  • State v. Roseberry 111 P.3d 402 Ariz. 2005
  • State v. Roseberry 111 P.3d 402 Ariz. 2005
    § 13-703(F)(5) (Supp. 2004).6 This court reviews a jury’s finding for substantial evidence, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury verdict.7
  • State v. Stroud 103 P.3d 912 Ariz. 2005
  • State v. Stroud 103 P.3d 912 Ariz. 2005
    2 B. Discussion ¶7 In Arizona, the crimes of resisting arrest and escape are controlled by separate statutes, each having distinct elements.