Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Guerra, 778 P.2d 1185.

615 citing documents.

State v. Billie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Billie
State v. Hitchcock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hitchcock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Hitchcock
State v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Jaime
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Johnson
State v. Glasscock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Glasscock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Glasscock
State v. Lebian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Lebian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against the defendant
State v. Perryman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Perryman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Perryman
State v. Saldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Saldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Saldana
State v. Nevarez-Laboy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Nevarez-Laboy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Defendant
State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rodvelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rodvelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
DISCUSSION ¶7 Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Rodvelt
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“If a defendant tells different stories during post-arrest questioning and at trial, the prosecution may properly inquire into the prior inconsistent statements, even though the prior statements involve ‘silence’ insofar as they omit facts contained in the later story.”
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Moore
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Salmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
DISCUSSION ¶7 Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Thomas
State v. Salmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Salmon
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Holgate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Holgate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Holgate
State v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, id., viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Morales
State v. Pierson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Pierson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Pegeese Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Pegeese Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Kelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Kelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Kelly
State v. Garso Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Garso Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Garso
State v. Shelton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Shelton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Shelton
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020