Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Guerra, 778 P.2d 1185.

615 citing documents.

State v. Lindsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Lindsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Lindsey
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Arellano
State v. Giron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Giron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Martinez
State v. Derrico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Derrico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
But it would be inappropriate for us to reevaluate the “evidence to decide if [we] would reach the same conclusions as the trier of fact.”
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Lester
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
You should not guess about the reason any other person is absent from the courtroom.” 5 STATE v. TAYLOR Decision of the Court reached.” ().
State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Maddux
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Dominguez
State v. Newell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Newell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Newell
State v. Rachal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rachal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rusagara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rusagara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Harvey
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Reed
State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Harvey
State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Dansdill 443 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Guerra , , 297, , 1193 (1989).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Johnson
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Carter
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Johnson
State v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Diaz
State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019