Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carver, 771 P.2d 1382.

370 citing documents.

Malik v. Trinidade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Malik v. Trinidade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Newman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Newman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) ().
State v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶¶ 8–10 (App. 2005) (failing to address alternative grounds for a ruling may result in waiver of the issue altogether).
State v. Bobbitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Bobbitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 13 (2020) (reviewing courts need not consider general, undeveloped claims of error); (failing to argue a claim typically waives and abandons that claim).
Rulnick v. Rulnick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Rulnick v. Rulnick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Bare allegations of bias and prejudice, unsupported by factual evidence, are insufficient to overcome the presumption of impartiality and do not require recusal.”
Lemay v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Lemay v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
State v. Cardwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Cardwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(abandoning and waiving unargued claims).
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(An appellant must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised or the claim is abandoned and waived.).
State v. Horak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Horak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“Failure to argue a claim usually 8 STATE v. TERAN Opinion of the Court constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”); ¶ 18 (2005) (the State bears the burde
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
("Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.").
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II 502 P.3d 437 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II 502 P.3d 437 Ariz. 2022
¶ 101 n.9 (2004) (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.” ()).
State v. Watson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Watson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. 33.16(c)(4); (failing to argue a claim abandons and waives that claim).
State v. Mayol Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Mayol Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Story Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Story Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Horst v. Horst Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Horst v. Horst Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“We presume that a judge is impartial, and ‘the party seeking recusal must prove bias or prejudice by a preponderance of the evidence.’” ¶ 14 (2013) ().
State v. Sernas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Sernas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 16 n.4 (App. 2018) (); ¶ 8 (App. 2001) (finding waiver for failure to develop argument).
State of Arizona v. Luis Armando Vargas 468 P.3d 739 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Luis Armando Vargas 468 P.3d 739 Ariz. 2020
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
State v. Stuebe 467 P.3d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Stuebe 467 P.3d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
("Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.").
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶22 Generally, we presume that a judicial officer is impartial, and the party challenging the officer’s impartiality “must prove bias or prejudice by a preponderance of the evidence.” ¶ 14 (2013) (); Simon v. Maricopa Med.
State v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(“Bare allegations of bias and prejudice, unsupported by factual evidence, are insufficient to overcome the presumption of impartiality .
State v. Gipson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gipson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(“Absent fundamental error, a party usually cannot raise error on appeal unless a proper objection was made at trial.”); ¶ 101, n.9 (2004) (“Failure to argue a claim [on appeal] usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.” ().