Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carver, 771 P.2d 1382.
-
State v. English
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 13 (2002); (the “[a]ppearance of interest 11 STATE v. ENGLISH Decision of the Court or prejudice is more than the speculation suggested by the defendant”).
- State v. Alfartousi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- State v. Hamilton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
NOVALIS-MARINE v. MONASH
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
- Knight v. Elias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
Knight v. Elias
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim.”) (citation omitted).
- State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
State v. Melendez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 13 (2020) ( (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”)).
- Gharadaghian v. Olives Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
Gharadaghian v. Olives
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citation omitted).
- Clay v. Geiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Clay v. Geiser
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See id.; (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citation omitted).
- Terrell v. Beck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Terrell v. Beck
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See id.; (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citation omitted).
- State v. Ames Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Ames
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 13 (2020) ( (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”)).
- State v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Estrada
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
- Hylton v. Shinn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Hylton v. Shinn
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 13 (2020) (“[I]f a defendant simply asserts a general claim of error on appeal and fails to develop it, a court is not obligated to consider it.”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”); see also In re $26,980.00 U.S. Currency, ¶ 28 (App. 2000) (this Court does not consider bald assertions offered without elaboration or citation to legal authority).
- State v. Ballard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Ballard
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
1 The December 2023 order stated as a reason for denial that Ballard used firearms during the commission of the offense.
- State v. Interval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Interval
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
P. 32.2(a)(3); 2 STATE v. INTERVAL Decision of the Court (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes .
- Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras 556 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
-
Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras
556 P.3d 291
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Although a trial court nonetheless has discretion to consider an untimely challenge for cause, by the time a judge has heard evidence or decided the ultimate issues in dispute, “it is too late to disqualify him on the ground of bias and prejudice.” Marsin, 78 Ariz. at 315
- State v. Borquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Borquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Givens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Givens
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 13 (2020) (“[I]f a defendant simply asserts a general claim of error on appeal and fails to develop it, a court is not obligated to consider it.”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
- State v. Ferrara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.J. and A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Ferrara
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(holding that the failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of such claim).
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.J. and A.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised[; f]ailure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”
- State v. Alvarez Bojorquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Alvarez Bojorquez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
To rebut this presumption, the party seeking a judge’s disqualification or recusal “must prove bias or prejudice by a preponderance of the evidence.”
- Professional Choice v. Appel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Professional Choice v. Appel
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.
- Arizona Republican Party v. Richer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Arizona Republican Party v. Richer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(explaining that failure to “present significant arguments, supported by authority,” in an opening brief on a particular claim usually results in waiver).
- State v. Cline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
State v. Cline
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶48 “Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.” see also Ariz. R. Crim.
- In Re: Mh 2022-006353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re: Mh 2022-006353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Acuna v. Pineda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Acuna v. Pineda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re Delinquency of A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re Delinquency of A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Trotter v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Trotter v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023