Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carver, 771 P.2d 1382.
- State v. Diaz 813 P.2d 728 Ariz. 1991
- State v. Diaz 813 P.2d 728 Ariz. 1991
- State v. Everhart 819 P.2d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- State v. Everhart 819 P.2d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
-
State v. Jackson
821 P.2d 1374
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
our supreme court stated, “We will not reverse a conviction on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds on direct appeal absent a separate evidentiary hearing concerning counsel’s actions or inactions.” The court stated that such an issue should be raised in post-conviction proceedi
- State v. Robbins 803 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
State v. Robbins
803 P.2d 942
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
ch sets forth as a ground for relief that: “The conviction or the sentence was in violation of the Constitution of the United States or of the State of Arizona.” The comment to Rule 32.1(a) in pertinent part states: “Claims of denial of counsel, of incompeteney of counsel, and of violation of other rights based on the federal or Arizona constitutions are included.” , our supreme court held that allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel will not be considered absent an expanded recor
- State v. Garcia 799 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
State v. Garcia
799 P.2d 888
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
the supreme court stated: We will not reverse a conviction on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds on direct appeal absent a separate evidentiary hearing concerning counsel’s actions or inactions.
- State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Youngblood 790 P.2d 759 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- State v. Youngblood 790 P.2d 759 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Marlow
786 P.2d 395
Ariz. 1989
Only where we may clearly determine from the record that the ineffective assistance claim is meritless will we elect to consider the issue on direct appeal.” , *69 175
- State v. Vierra 785 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- State v. Vierra 785 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989