Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carver, 771 P.2d 1382.

370 citing documents.

State v. Curry 931 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Curry 931 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
P. 10.1(b); , (placing one’s perceptions and concerns on the record does not satisfy the specificity requirement of Rule 10.1(b)).
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jones 917 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1996
(‘We will not reverse a conviction on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds on direct appeal absent a *483 separate evidentiary hearing concerning counsel’s actions or inactions.”).
State v. Hardwick 905 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Hardwick 905 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
We do not review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal unless “we may clearly determine from the record that the ineffective assistance claim is meritless.”
State v. Herrera 905 P.2d 1377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Herrera 905 P.2d 1377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”); , (this court will not review meritorious issues not presented to trial court in motion for rehearing from denial of post-convicti
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
State v. Salazar 898 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Salazar 898 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
State v. Krum 893 P.2d 759 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Krum 893 P.2d 759 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
(refusing to “reverse a conviction on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds on direct appeal absent a separate evidentiary hearing concerning counsel’s actions or inactions”).
Krone v. Hotham 890 P.2d 1149 Ariz. 1995
Krone v. Hotham 890 P.2d 1149 Ariz. 1995
160 Ariz. at 15 , 770 P.2d at 319
State v. Styers 865 P.2d 765 Ariz. 1993
State v. Styers 865 P.2d 765 Ariz. 1993
Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.” , see Ariz. R.Crim.P.
State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
(failure to argue a claim of error on appeal results in waiver unless error is fundamental); Rule 31.13(c)(1), Ariz.R.Crim.P.
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. Russell 858 P.2d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Russell 858 P.2d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Renner 868 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Renner 868 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
Judges must be impartial, , and avoid any appearance of partiality
Carpenter v. Superior Court 862 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Carpenter v. Superior Court 862 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
defendant argues that the trial court was obliged to grant an evidentiary hearing on these claims.
State v. Holguin 870 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Holguin 870 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Landrigan 859 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1993
State v. Landrigan 859 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1993
State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
State v. Medrano 844 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1992
Though no evidence on this issue was taken because the trial court erroneously ruled that the question could be raised on direct appeal and therefore was precluded, , we are able to “clearly determine from the record that the ineffective assistance claim is meritless.”
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. West 845 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. West 845 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See, , (voluntariness issues); , (ineffective assistance issues).
State v. Allgood 831 P.2d 1290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Allgood 831 P.2d 1290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
State v. Huffman 820 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Huffman 820 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991