Cited by

DISCUSSION ¶11 This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to McLaren, ¶ 12 (2003) (citing cases), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

4 REDDING, et al. v. SOUTHEAST VALLEY Decision of the Court DISCUSSION ¶11 This court reviews an order granting summary judgment de novo, ¶ 12 (2003), and will affirm if it is correct for any reason

¶ 12 (2003) (citation omitted).

This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enter., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review ¶11 “[I]n determining whether either party is entitled to summary judgment, we must view the facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 13 (2003) (citation omitted).

PREMIER CONSULTING, et al. v. PEACE RELEAF, et al. Opinion of the Court 240, ¶ 12 (2003).