Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes, 153 P.3d 1040.

126 citing documents.

State v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Nettrour Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Nettrour Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Astle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Astle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Bergstrom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Bergstrom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 20 (2007) (holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims may be brought only in Rule 32 post-conviction proceedings).
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Stuebe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Stuebe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 20 (2007) (“We therefore hold, consistent with [ ¶ 9 (2002)], that a defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review.”).
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Borquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Borquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 20 (2007), we decline to consider Borquez’s suggestion that his counsel was unprepared at trial to effectively address the DNA evidence.
State v. Mortimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Mortimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Kemp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Kemp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 20 (2007) (citing Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Massey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Massey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
In Re: Ms2020-000001 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
In Re: Ms2020-000001 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 10 (2007) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)); see also Matter of Carmody, 653 N.E.2d 977, 984 (Ill.
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 20 (2007) (“We therefore hold .
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 20 (2007) (“[A] defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding— not before trial, at trial, or on direct review.”).
State v. Bullard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bullard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 20 (2007) (“[A] defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding— not before trial, at trial, or on direct review.”).
State v. Saulsberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Saulsberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 16 (2007) ( ¶ 9 (2002)).
State v. Murphy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Murphy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bolton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bolton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Adair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Adair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Hardisty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Hardisty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018