Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L., 365 P.3d 353.

594 citing documents.

Jesse R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jesse R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
at 150, ¶ 12; ¶ 15 (2016).
Nina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Nina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we accept the court's "findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them," and will affirm the termination order "unless it is clearly erroneous," ¶ 9 (2016).
Walter S. v. Elisa P., E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Walter S. v. Elisa P., E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Andri K. v. Russell J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Andri K. v. Russell J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See, ¶ 1 (2016) (superior court “may conclude that a proposed [step-parent] adoption benefits the child and supports a finding that severance is in the child’s best interests” in a private termination proceeding, “just as in state-initiated proceedings.”).
Meagen G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Meagen G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 9 (2016) (explaining “juvenile court is in the best position to weigh evidence and assess witness credibility”).
Angel L. v. Dcs, A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Angel L. v. Dcs, A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Joan G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Joan G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Steinfelt v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Steinfelt v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Bonna D. v. Chelsea M., P.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Bonna D. v. Chelsea M., P.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Michael D., Turquoise P. v. Dcs, N.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Michael D., Turquoise P. v. Dcs, N.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jamie R. v. Dcs, J.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jamie R. v. Dcs, J.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Roarke T. v. Sara K., M.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Roarke T. v. Sara K., M.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Thus, we will “accept the juvenile court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them, and will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016).
Michael O. v. Dcs, C.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Michael O. v. Dcs, C.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Walters v. D'Annibale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Walters v. D'Annibale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
The superior court “is in the best position to weigh evidence and assess witness credibility.” ¶ 9 (2016).
Samantha O. v. Jeffrey F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Samantha O. v. Jeffrey F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Casey H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Casey H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶13 “When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely, a juvenile court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” ¶ 12 (2016); see also Titus S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 22 (App. 2018) (“Thus, while courts have often referred to a child’s ‘adoptability’ or her ‘adoptive placement’ in determining best interests, we conclude those findings, to be meaning
Kiara D. v. Rudy N., R.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kiara D. v. Rudy N., R.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
John K. v. Dcs, C.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
John K. v. Dcs, C.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶22 “[W]e accept the [superior] court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them, and will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016) (citing Michael J., 196 Ariz. at 250, ¶ 20).
Toren C., Fawn W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Toren C., Fawn W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Deandre F. v. Dcs, A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Augustine D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Deandre F. v. Dcs, A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Augustine D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Shukura J., X'zavier F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Shukura J., X'zavier F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely, a [superior] court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” ¶ 12 (2016) (citation omitted).
Timothy B. v. dcs/h.B. Ariz. 2022
Timothy B. v. dcs/h.B. Ariz. 2022
Consequently, at this stage, “the court must balance this diluted parental interest against the independent and often adverse interests of the child in a safe and stable home life.” Id.; ¶ 15 (2016).
Erin S. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Erin S. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sarah P., Michael M. v. Dcs, V.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sarah P., Michael M. v. Dcs, V.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶31 “[W]e accept the juvenile court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them, and will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016) (citing Michael J., 196 Ariz. at 250, ¶ 20).