Cited by

“Because the juvenile court is in the best position to weigh evidence and assess witness credibility, we accept the juvenile court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them, and will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016).

¶23 Here, the juvenile court found that termination was in C.P.’s best interests because Grandmother was “meeting all of his needs” and because termination would “further the plan of adoption, which would provide the child with permanency and stability.” ¶ 12 (2016) (“When a .

¶ 12 (2016) (“When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely, a juvenile court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.”).

the court also found that Father is “incapable of providing a normal life for [Damien] due to [his] incarceration.” “When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely, a [superior] court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” ¶ 12 (2016).

-4, ¶ 12 (2016) (citations omitted).

Alma S., 245 Ariz. at 150, ¶ 12 ( ¶ 15 (2016)).

“When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely, a [superior] court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” ¶ 12 (2016).

Further, “[t]he ‘child’s interest in stability and security’ must be the court’s primary concern.” Alma S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (2018) ( ¶ 15 (2016)).

Alma S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (2018); –4, ¶ 12 (2016) (noting that relevant factors include whether (1) current placement is meeting child’s needs, (2) an adoption plan is in place, and (3) the child is adoptable).