Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L., 365 P.3d 353.

582 citing documents.

Derek S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Derek S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Valentyna S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Valentyna S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We will affirm the court’s decision “unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016).
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
e Court ¶29 When evaluating best interests, the juvenile court must consider all relevant facts and determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether a preponderance of the evidence supports a finding that a child “would derive an affirmative benefit from termination or incur a detriment by continuing in the relationship.” Oscar O., 209 Ariz. at 334, ¶ 6; –5, ¶ 16 (2016).
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-5, ¶ 16 (2016) (“It is well established in state-initiated cases that the child’s prospective adoption .
Shea G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shea G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
the role of father figure for the [C]hildren;” is “emotionally bonded to the [C]hildren and committed to meeting their needs;” “the [C]hildren refer to Stepfather 5 AARON B. v. ASHLEY H. Decision of the Court as their father;” and Stepfather “plans to adopt the children.” ¶ 12 (2016) (“When a .
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
at 148, ¶ 1; –4, ¶ 12 (2016).
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Clint G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Clint G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Darryl S. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Darryl S. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brian H. v. MacArena H., I.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brian H. v. MacArena H., I.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 15 (2016) (quoting Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 286 ¶ 34).
Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Anthony A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Anthony A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“Because the juvenile court is in the best position to weigh evidence and assess witness credibility, we accept the juvenile court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them, and will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016).
Richard R. v. Daisy A., I.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Richard R. v. Daisy A., I.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Logan M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Logan M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Decision of the Court permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” ¶ 12 (2016).
Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bradley H. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bradley H. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“Because the juvenile court is in the best position to weigh evidence and assess witness credibility, we accept the juvenile court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them, and will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016).