Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L., 365 P.3d 353.

594 citing documents.

Paradise L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ratliff v. Billingsley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ratliff v. Billingsley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Paradise L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Troy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Troy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Alma S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (2018); –4, ¶ 12 (2016) (noting that relevant factors include whether (1) current placement is meeting child’s needs, (2) an adoption plan is in place, and (3) the child is adoptable).
Jose F. v. Dcs, A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jose F. v. Dcs, A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jesse S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jennifer G. v. Michael C., A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jennifer G. v. Michael C., A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jesse S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Derek S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Derek S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Valentyna S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Valentyna S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We will affirm the court’s decision “unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016).
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
e Court ¶29 When evaluating best interests, the juvenile court must consider all relevant facts and determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether a preponderance of the evidence supports a finding that a child “would derive an affirmative benefit from termination or incur a detriment by continuing in the relationship.” Oscar O., 209 Ariz. at 334, ¶ 6; –5, ¶ 16 (2016).
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessica L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-5, ¶ 16 (2016) (“It is well established in state-initiated cases that the child’s prospective adoption .
Shea G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shea G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
the role of father figure for the [C]hildren;” is “emotionally bonded to the [C]hildren and committed to meeting their needs;” “the [C]hildren refer to Stepfather 5 AARON B. v. ASHLEY H. Decision of the Court as their father;” and Stepfather “plans to adopt the children.” ¶ 12 (2016) (“When a .
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
at 148, ¶ 1; –4, ¶ 12 (2016).
Cassie F., Warren M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Clint G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Clint G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Melissa S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Darryl S. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Darryl S. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brian H. v. MacArena H., I.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020