Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L., 365 P.3d 353.

582 citing documents.

Pamela J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pamela J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tiffany L., Gregory C. v. Dcs, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tiffany L., Gregory C. v. Dcs, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
John O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
John O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“Because the juvenile court is in the best position to weigh the evidence and assess witness credibility, we accept the juvenile court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them, and will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016).
Michael A. v. Elizabeth G., M.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Michael A. v. Elizabeth G., M.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In examining circumstances that benefit a child, “[a] child’s prospective adoption is a benefit that can support a best-interests finding.” 4, ¶¶ 1, 16 (2016).
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Julian D. v. McKenzi W., M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (citations omitted); ¶ 16 (2016).
Julian D. v. McKenzi W., M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sandra R./sergio C. v. dcs/m.R./f.M./j.M. Ariz. 2020
Sandra R./sergio C. v. dcs/m.R./f.M./j.M. Ariz. 2020
and M.R. “[W]e accept the juvenile court’s findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them, and will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.” ¶ 9 (2016).
Adam W. v. Tori F., T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Adam W. v. Tori F., T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Richard P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Richard P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (citations omitted); ¶ 16 (2016).
Jessi N., Ryan J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jessi N., Ryan J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 15 (2016) (quoting Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 286, ¶ 34).
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 19 (2016) (quotation omitted).
Shawna N., John N. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shawna N., John N. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-500274, (citations omitted); ¶ 13 (2018) ( ¶ 16 (2016)).
Samantha A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
at 148, ¶ 1; –4, ¶ 12 (2016).
Matthew F. v. Gabrielle N., R.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew F. v. Gabrielle N., R.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 15 (2016) (quoting Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 286 ¶ 34).
Melissa C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Leah M. v. Dcs, K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Serah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Leah M. v. Dcs, K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 9 (2016); Michael J. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Serah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Krystle M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Krystle M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Although “the child’s prospective adoption is a benefit that can support a best-interests finding,” ¶ 16 (2016), the court “must consider the totality of the circumstances existing at the time of the severance determination,” Alma S., 245 Ariz. at 150-51 ¶ 13 (citation omitted).
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely, a juvenile court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” ¶ 12 (2016).
Trung N. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rachael A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rachael A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely, a juvenile court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” ¶ 12 (2016).
Trung N. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 15 (2016) (quoting Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 286 ¶ 34).
Michael M. v. Anita P., M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019