Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L., 365 P.3d 353.

582 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to I.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to S.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 9 (2016); accord Brionna J. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, CV-22-0158-PR, 2023 WL 5024023, at *5, ¶¶ 30–31 (Ariz. Aug.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L. 536 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L. 536 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Guardianship of P.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
The court found that the children are in an adoptive placement, their needs are being met, “and the child[ren’s] prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely,” such that the termination of parental rights is in the children’s best interests “so as to permit adoption.” ¶ 12 (2016).
In Re Guardianship of P.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Brionna J. v. dcs/a.V. Ariz. 2023
Brionna J. v. dcs/a.V. Ariz. 2023
First, the appellate court will review the factual findings made by the juvenile court, and its factual findings will be accepted “if reasonable evidence and inferences support them.” See Jessie D., 251 Ariz. at 580 ¶ 10 ( ¶ 9 (2016)).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
at 150, ¶ 12 ( ¶ 15 (2016)).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Dependency as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Dependency as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to C.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to C.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., and accept the court’s factual findings if reasonable evidence supports them, ¶ 9 (2016).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to W.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. and J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to W.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. and J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Action No. JS-501904, ¶ 20 (2016) (affirming juvenile court’s finding that termination would be in child’s best interests because “making [child] adoptable” by stepfather “would affirmatively improve [child’s] life” by “add[ing] permanency and stability to the de-facto father-son relationship that [s]tepfather and [child] already have”
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
at 151 ¶ 18; ¶ 3 (2016).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to O.M. 525 P.3d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to O.M. 525 P.3d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Steven M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Kaelyn W. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Steven M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Kaelyn W. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
It also considered the fact that siblings were all placed together, “which maintains their sibling relationships.” “When a current placement meets the child’s needs and the child’s prospective adoption is otherwise legally possible and likely, a [superior] court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” ¶ 12 (2016).
Lisa R. v. Dcs, A.H., W.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lisa R. v. Dcs, A.H., W.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Felicia S., Robert S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Felicia S., Robert S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jesse R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jesse R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
at 150, ¶ 12; ¶ 15 (2016).
Nina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Nina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we accept the court's "findings of fact if reasonable evidence and inferences support them," and will affirm the termination order "unless it is clearly erroneous," ¶ 9 (2016).
Walter S. v. Elisa P., E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Walter S. v. Elisa P., E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Andri K. v. Russell J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Andri K. v. Russell J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See, ¶ 1 (2016) (superior court “may conclude that a proposed [step-parent] adoption benefits the child and supports a finding that severance is in the child’s best interests” in a private termination proceeding, “just as in state-initiated proceedings.”).
Meagen G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Meagen G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 9 (2016) (explaining “juvenile court is in the best position to weigh evidence and assess witness credibility”).
Angel L. v. Dcs, A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Angel L. v. Dcs, A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by