Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1245 citing documents.

Wayne W., Patricia B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rocco R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rocco R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Leo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Leo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49, ¶ 12 (2000) (stating that severance of a parental relationship may be warranted where the court finds one of the A.R.S.
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Penny G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Penny G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Matthew D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., –49, ¶ 12 (2000) (reaffirming that a parent’s right to custody and control of his or her own child while fundamental, is not absolute, and that severance of a parental relationship may be warranted where the state proves one of A.R.S.
Matthew D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mongco T., Jack v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mongco T., Jack v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Candelaria P. v. Dcs, C.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Candelaria P. v. Dcs, C.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000); ¶ 41 (2005).
Shannon S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Elizabeth v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shannon S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., –49, ¶ 12 (2000); Ariz. R.P.
Elizabeth v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mychel E. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mychel E. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2000) (accepting best interests finding when parent did not challenge it).
Michael C. v. Dcs, X.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael C. v. Dcs, X.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Laura L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Laura L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., –49, ¶ 12 (2000); Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 284, ¶ 22.
Salvatore D. v. Whitney D., S.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Salvatore D. v. Whitney D., S.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 22 (2000) (citation omitted).
Stella H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lisa W. v. Dcs, K.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lisa W. v. Dcs, K.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Stella H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and by a preponderance of the evidence that severance serves the child's best interests, ¶ 22 (2005).
Sarah R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sarah R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jerome H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jerome H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brittnie C., Procoro R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Catrina K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brittnie C., Procoro R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Catrina K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 13 (2000), and we address only whether sufficient evidence supports the court’s finding that Mother “ha[d] substantially neglected or wilfully refused to remedy the circumstances that cause[d] the child[ren] to be in an out-of-home placement[,]” see A.R.S.
Consuelo v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Consuelo v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jessica S. v. Dcs, T.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jessica S. v. Dcs, T.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Shontal K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Shontal K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sergio v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by