Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1269 citing documents.

Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 11 (2000) (internal citations and quotations omitted).
Joseph C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Augustin C. v. Dcs, E.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jeuda K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
C.D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tzsiah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Linda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tzsiah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49, ¶ 12 (2000); Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 284, ¶ 22.
C.D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Linda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49, ¶ 12 (2000); Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 284, ¶ 22.
Jeuda K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gabrial G. v. Dcs, G.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gabrial G. v. Dcs, G.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and proof by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 41 (2005).
Angelina D. v. Dcs, D.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Angelina D. v. Dcs, D.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lucian B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lucian B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eric R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eric R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 27 (2000) (holding if reasonable evidence supports termination on any one statutory ground, the appellate court need not consider challenges pertaining to other grounds).
Donetrius W. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Donetrius W. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hannah B. v. Dcs, M.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hannah B. v. Dcs, M.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wayne W., Patricia B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wayne W., Patricia B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rocco R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rocco R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Leo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Leo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49, ¶ 12 (2000) (stating that severance of a parental relationship may be warranted where the court finds one of the A.R.S.
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Penny G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Penny G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Matthew D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., –49, ¶ 12 (2000) (reaffirming that a parent’s right to custody and control of his or her own child while fundamental, is not absolute, and that severance of a parental relationship may be warranted where the state proves one of A.R.S.
Matthew D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mongco T., Jack v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mongco T., Jack v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Candelaria P. v. Dcs, C.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Candelaria P. v. Dcs, C.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000); ¶ 41 (2005).
Shannon S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Elizabeth v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shannon S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., –49, ¶ 12 (2000); Ariz. R.P.
Elizabeth v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mychel E. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mychel E. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2000) (accepting best interests finding when parent did not challenge it).
Michael C. v. Dcs, X.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael C. v. Dcs, X.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Laura L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017