Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1269 citing documents.

Amber S. v. Dcs, L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amber S. v. Dcs, L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ryan H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gabrielle F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gabrielle F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michelle M. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amal A., Abdulsalam T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amal A., Abdulsalam T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michelle M. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael M. v. Katie A., E.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael M. v. Katie A., E.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Miguel D. v. Dcs, M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Miguel D. v. Dcs, M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000).4 We “will affirm the juvenile court’s termination order ‘absent an abuse of discretion or unless the court’s findings of fact were clearly erroneous.’” E.R.
Janine E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Janine E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Rebekah G. v. Katy C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Rebekah G. v. Katy C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000) (citing A.R.S.
Ricardo R. v. Maria A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ricardo R. v. Maria A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joel D. v. Dcs, A.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joel D. v. Dcs, A.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 27 (2000) (if appellate court affirms one statutory basis, it need not address other statutory bases for termination).
Vanessa P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Vanessa P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11-12 (2000) (citations omitted).
Susan J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jena H. v. Todd H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Susan J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000) (citation omitted).
Jena H. v. Todd H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 13 (2000) (finding appellant conceded court’s best interest finding by failing to challenge it), in the exercise of our discretion we will address the abandonment and best interests issues that Mother has preserved for our review.
Keosha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jimmie G., Sally G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Keosha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jimmie G., Sally G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Justin M. v. April M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Justin M. v. April M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tasha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tasha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and by a preponderance of the evidence that severance is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 41 (2005).
Elijah H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Elijah H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Thomas A. v. Samantha A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nicole M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nicole M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Thomas A. v. Samantha A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., – 49, ¶ 12 (2000).
Janice J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jayna S. v. Dcs, X.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Janice J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jayna S. v. Dcs, X.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tony J. v. Dcs, A.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Maurice N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Martha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Martha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., 251, ¶¶ 12, 27 (2000).
Tony J. v. Dcs, A.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017