Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1245 citing documents.

Francisco R. v. Dcs, M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., –50, ¶ 18, –86 (2000).
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Delia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -49, ¶ 12, -85 (2000).
Delia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Candra H. v. Dcs, C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Luis T., Angelica T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Luis T., Angelica T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Candra H. v. Dcs, C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Autumn R. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Autumn R. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Chaine M. v. Pamela R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Chaine M. v. Pamela R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cassandra P. v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cassandra P. v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Desiree S. v. Department of Child Safety 334 P.3d 222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Desiree S. v. Department of Child Safety 334 P.3d 222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mother now appeals.4 DISCUSSION ¶7 A parent’s parental rights can be terminated if the juvenile court finds that the Department has proven a statutory basis for termination by clear and convincing evidence, ¶ 12, and there is proof by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the child’s best interest.
Lisa H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lisa H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Gavino C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Gavino C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -50, ¶ 18, -86 (2000).
Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety 332 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety 332 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Robert P. v. Dcs, L.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Robert P. v. Dcs, L.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶11 –52, ¶ 29, –88 (2000), the supreme court provided further guidance regarding severance under § 8-533(B)(4): The trial court, in making its decision, should consider all relevant factors, including, but not limited to: (1) the length and strength of any parent-child relationsh
Kimberly B. v. Adcs, P.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kimberly B. v. Adcs, P.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Michele M. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lloyd B., Tina M. v. Ades, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Michele M. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 12, (outlining statutory procedures for terminating parental rights); see also Marina P. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Lloyd B., Tina M. v. Ades, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Nicholas S. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Nicholas S. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -50, ¶ 18, -86 (2000).
Barbara K. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Barbara K. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 12, and by a preponderance of the evidence that severance is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 41
Amber W. v. Ades, B.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Amber W. v. Ades, B.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Christopher L. v. Ades, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Christopher L. v. Ades, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -49, ¶ 12, -85 (2000).
Tonya C. v. Ades, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tonya C. v. Ades, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Rocky J. 323 P.3d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Rocky J. 323 P.3d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 319 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 319 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jose M. v. Eleanor J. 316 P.3d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jose M. v. Eleanor J. 316 P.3d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Carolina H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 307 P.3d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013