Cited by

Significantly, in providing immunity from suit 6 The dissent points to this Court’s reference in ¶ 36 (2013), about a lawsuit being based in part on the filing of bar complaints, “even though Rule 48(l) prohibits civil lawsuits against bar complainants.” See infra ¶ 98.

the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’” ¶ 14 (App. 2019) (); cf. Matter of a Member of State Bar of Arizona, ¶ 37 (2025) (in a disciplinary proceeding, “[f]indings are clearly erroneous if they are not supported by reasonable evidence.”) ( ¶ 11 (2013)).

“Findings are clearly erroneous if they are not supported by reasonable evidence.” ¶ 11 (2013).

“Findings are clearly erroneous if they are not supported by reasonable evidence.” ¶ 11 (2013).

.”); -7, ¶¶ 12-21 (2013) (providing ER 3.1 requires an attorney to be sufficiently informed “about the applicable facts and law to make good faith and nonfrivolous arguments” when filing and maintaining an action).

¶ 42 (2013) (citation omitted).

.”); –7, ¶¶ 12–21 (2013) (ER 3.1 requires an attorney to be sufficiently informed “about the applicable facts and law to make good faith and nonfrivolous arguments” when filing and maintaining an action).

¶ 41 (2013) (quoting Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 554 (1967)).

¶ 41 (2013) (citing Pierson, 386 U.S. at 554).