Cited by

¶ 27 (2007); ¶ 6 (App. 2004).

¶ 6 (App. 2004) (explaining the jury alone “weigh[s] the evidence and determine[s] the credibility of the witnesses”).

¶ 6 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).

¶ 6 (App. 2004) (explaining that even where a record contains conflicting evidence, the jury alone “weigh[s] the evidence and determine[s] the credibility of the witnesses.”).

¶ 6 (App. 2004) (holding that conflicting evidence goes to weight and credibility, which is for the jury to decide).

See Aguilar, 209 Ariz. at 49 ¶ 31; ¶ 33 (App. 2004); Ariz. R. Evid.

411 (1984) (discussing time factor in excited utterance determination, stating that “the length of time such stress will last varies among individuals”), remoteness 9 STATE v. SANCHEZ Opinion of the Court generally goes to the weight rather than the admissibility of evidence, (discussing remoteness of other-act evidence admitted under Rule 404(b), Ariz. R. Evid.).

of speaking is so dependent on demeanor and intonation as to be inaccessible to a reviewing court,” and “[t]hus, this is a paradigm case for deference to the trial judge, who had the opportunity to see and hear her speak.”); see also State v. Gonzalez–Gutierrez, (stating trial court determines credibility of witnesses at pre-trial suppression hearing); ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (addressing claim of insufficient evidence and noting that “[a]lthough the record contains some conflicting evidence, 9 STATE v.

This court does not weigh evidence; “that is the function of the jury.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004).

“We review de novo the interpretation of statutes and rules.” ¶ 30 (App. 2004).

Although a record may contain conflicting evidence, the jury is tasked with “weigh[ing] the evidence and determin[ing] the credibility of the witnesses.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004).

“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004) ().

We will not assess the credibility of witnesses because it is “for the jury to 5 STATE v. MCKENZIE Decision of the Court weigh the evidence and determine the credibility of the witnesses.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004).

We will not assess the credibility of witnesses because it is “for the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the credibility of the witnesses.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004).

“[W]e do not reweigh evidence; that is the function of the jury.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004).