DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Maximov v. Maximov, 205 P.3d 1146.

28 citing documents.

  • MacNeil v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • MacNeil v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    ¶28 “We review the court’s decision to modify the amount of [spousal maintenance] for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 2 (App. 2009).
  • Porter v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Porter v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Greenboom v. Ran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Greenboom v. Ran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶ 9 (App. 2007) (spousal maintenance); ¶ 2 (App. 2009) (temporary orders).
  • Morales v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Morales v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶¶ 18–20 (App. 2022) (noting courts’ discretion to modify temporary support orders retroactively); ¶¶ 7–8 (App. 2009) (“[T]he family court retains its authority to modify temporary support nunc pro tunc.”).
  • Goodhope v. Goodhope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Goodhope v. Goodhope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 7 (App. 2009); ("Arizona law extends the trial court substantial discretion to set the amount and duration of spousal maintenance.").
  • Broadbent v. Broadbent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Broadbent v. Broadbent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    § 25-315(F)(2); –02 ¶ 10 (App. 2009).
  • Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    § 25-318 (2018); ¶ 7 (App. 2009) (citing Ariz. R. Fam.
  • McClendon v. McClendon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • McClendon v. McClendon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Uthe v. Uthe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Uthe v. Uthe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Simon v. Simon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Simon v. Simon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “We review the court’s decision to modify the amount of support for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 2 (App. 2009).
  • Bourke v. Bourke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Bourke v. Bourke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Britton 250 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
  • State v. Britton 250 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
    While neither Defendant nor the State has cited this statute, “when we are considering the interpretation and application of statutes, we do not believe we can be limited to the arguments made by the parties if that would cause us to reach an incorrect result.” , 301 n. 4, ¶ 6, , 1148 n. 4 (App.2009) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).