Cited by

(stating that a proper partial final judgment under Civil Rule 54(b) must “dispose of at least one separate claim of a multi-claim action”).

“The general rule is that an appeal lies only from a final judgment.” see also A.R.S.

“The general rule is that an appeal lies only from a final judgment.” see also A.R.S.

HUSTRULID v. STAKEBAKE Opinion of the Court 304 (App. 1991).

See Musa, 130 Ariz. at 313; Davis 5 ALOIA, et al. v. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE

Subsumed within the significant factual overlap theory is the rule that a claimant who has set forth a number of legal theories in support of only one possible recovery has stated only one claim for relief.” (quoting Ind.

The superior court should not certify a partial judgment under Rule 54(b) if (1) “a significant factual overlap” exists between the dismissed and surviving litigation, (citation omitted), or (2) the appellate court would need to “decide the same issues more than once,” GM Dev.

¶13 Although neither party has raised the issue, we have an independent obligation to determine whether we have appellate jurisdiction, ¶ 4 (App. 2010), and we must dismiss an appeal over which we lack jurisdiction

Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp. , , 304, , 1122 (App. 1991) (final disposition of individual claim required).

P. 8(a)(3), (d)(2)-(3); (stating “[a] party has multiple claims if the factual basis for recovery states different claims that [can] be separately enforced”).

2 SUSIE B. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court DISCUSSION ¶5 “This court has the duty to review its jurisdiction and, if jurisdiction is lacking, to dismiss the appeal.”

County of Cochise, ¶ 12 (App. 2012)

¶ 6 (App. 2012) ( ¶ 5 (App. 2007)).

P. 54(c); Madrid, 236 Ariz. at 223 n.3 ¶¶ 3, 5, ; Davis, 168 Ariz. at 304, .

("The general rule is that an appeal lies only from a final judgment.").