Cited by

We have found that an issue was not debatable when “the answer to the questions is clear,” and when the “[t]he record shows so clearly” the answer to the issue raised, Air E.

We have found that an issue was not debatable when “the answer to the questions is clear,” and when the “[t]he record shows so clearly” the answer to the issue raised, Air East

(“Where the appellant raises debatable issues, failure to file an answering brief constitutes a confession of reversible error.”).

decision) (citing Air E., ); see also In re Majidi v. Milkwick, 1 CA-CV 24-0187 FC, 2024 WL 5165446, at *2, ¶ 12 (Ariz. App. Dec.

decision) (citing Air E., ).

See, e.g., Air East, 5 LUNA v. PEINADO Decision of the Court (App. 1980).

Division Two of the Court of Appeals, , described the requirements of the statute as "clearly jurisdictional."

§ 25-328 is jurisdictional, , and thus may be raised at anytime.