DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. Meienberg, 156 P.3d 1149.

189 citing documents.

  • Kuerschner v. Kuerschner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    ¶ 9 (App. 2010) (contempt order); ¶ 16 n.8 (App. 2012) (vexatious-litigant orders issued within a single case constitute injunctive relief); Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007) (“We review a trial court’s grant of injunctive relief for an abuse of discretion.”).2 I. Contempt Order ¶10 We first address Stefanie’s special action challenging the contempt order.
  • Grandell v. Grandell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) ("A court abuses its discretion if .
  • Rhoades v. Rhoades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding.’”) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • Escobedo v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
  • Thomas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Thomas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (suggesting the superior court does not abuse its discretion when its decision is based on substantial evidence).
  • ROBERTS v. STATE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • ROBERTS v. STATE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Ortega v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Ortega v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    Flying Diamond Airpark, LLC v. Meienberg, 6 ORTEGA V. ROBLES Decision of the Court ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Nbd Enterprises, LLC v. James Christopher Arnold; Acp Investments Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
  • Nbd Enterprises, LLC v. James Christopher Arnold; Acp Investments Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
  • Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (citation modified).
  • Ratliff v. Vanig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Ratliff v. Vanig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, [or makes] some other substantial error of law[.]” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Loiselle v. Loiselle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Loiselle v. Loiselle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
  • Mohave v. Messner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Mohave v. Messner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007).
  • Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras 556 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
  • Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras 556 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
    See Flying Diamond Airpark, (injunctive relief reviewed for abuse of discretion).
  • Stoney v. Stoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Stoney v. Stoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Potter v. Arizona House Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Potter v. Arizona House Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007).
  • Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (finding a court abuses its discretion when it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence).
  • Sean Bonnette v. Mg Financial Enterprises, LLC A & G Car Sales, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
  • Sean Bonnette v. Mg Financial Enterprises, LLC A & G Car Sales, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
    FACTUAL BACKGROUND ¶2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s judgment.” Flying Diamond Airpark, (quoting Cimarron Foothills Cmty.
  • New Sundance v. Cutler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • New Sundance v. Cutler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    cf. Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 28 (App. 2007) (quoting City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc., ¶ 22 (App. 1999)) (equitable estoppel); (promissory estoppel).
  • Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • In Re Term of Parental Rights as to W.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • In Re Term of Parental Rights as to W.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Although a court abuses its discretion when it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007), there is no evidence that the court did so here.
  • Olesen v. daniel/burge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Olesen v. daniel/burge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Montes v. Montes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Montes v. Montes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • Whisenand v. Whisenand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Whisenand v. Whisenand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Wright v. Pandora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Wright v. Pandora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Walsh, ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’”) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • Strojnik v. Kashyap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Strojnik v. Kashyap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007).
  • Simone v. Thompson, IV Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Simone v. Thompson, IV Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.