Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. Meienberg, 156 P.3d 1149.

185 citing documents.

Thomas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Thomas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (suggesting the superior court does not abuse its discretion when its decision is based on substantial evidence).
ROBERTS v. STATE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
ROBERTS v. STATE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
Ortega v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Ortega v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Flying Diamond Airpark, LLC v. Meienberg, 6 ORTEGA V. ROBLES Decision of the Court ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
Nbd Enterprises, LLC v. James Christopher Arnold; Acp Investments Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Nbd Enterprises, LLC v. James Christopher Arnold; Acp Investments Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (citation modified).
Ratliff v. Vanig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Ratliff v. Vanig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, [or makes] some other substantial error of law[.]” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
Loiselle v. Loiselle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Loiselle v. Loiselle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
Mohave v. Messner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Mohave v. Messner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007).
Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras 556 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras 556 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
See Flying Diamond Airpark, (injunctive relief reviewed for abuse of discretion).
Stoney v. Stoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Stoney v. Stoney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
Potter v. Arizona House Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Potter v. Arizona House Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007).
Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (finding a court abuses its discretion when it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence).
Sean Bonnette v. Mg Financial Enterprises, LLC A & G Car Sales, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Sean Bonnette v. Mg Financial Enterprises, LLC A & G Car Sales, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
FACTUAL BACKGROUND ¶2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s judgment.” Flying Diamond Airpark, (quoting Cimarron Foothills Cmty.
New Sundance v. Cutler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
New Sundance v. Cutler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
cf. Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 28 (App. 2007) (quoting City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc., ¶ 22 (App. 1999)) (equitable estoppel); (promissory estoppel).
Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to W.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to W.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Although a court abuses its discretion when it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007), there is no evidence that the court did so here.
Olesen v. daniel/burge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Olesen v. daniel/burge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
Montes v. Montes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Montes v. Montes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
Whisenand v. Whisenand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Whisenand v. Whisenand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
Wright v. Pandora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Wright v. Pandora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Walsh, ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’”) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
Strojnik v. Kashyap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Strojnik v. Kashyap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007).
Simone v. Thompson, IV Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Simone v. Thompson, IV Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
Hinton v. Hinton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Hinton v. Hinton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
rt abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).