Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 323 P.3d 1179.

65 citing documents.

Eleby v. Asbe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Eleby v. Asbe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep't of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (interpreting A.R.S.
Rhoads v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Rhoads v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
§§ 12-120.21(A)(1), -913; see Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
Kirsten v. adot/mvd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Kirsten v. adot/mvd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
Flores v. La Paz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Flores v. La Paz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
Miles L. Kaufman v. John Halikowski, Director, Arizona Department of Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Miles L. Kaufman v. John Halikowski, Director, Arizona Department of Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div.
Pourshirazi v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Pourshirazi v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
Farrell v. Myers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Petramala v. Des Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Petramala v. Des Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
§ 12-913 expressly allows a party to appeal to the “supreme court,” we have construed this provision as “also allowing an appeal to the court of appeals.” Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (collecting cases).
Starr v. Az Bof Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Starr v. Az Bof Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014); see also Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC, ¶ 23 (App. 2016).
Opuroku v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Opuroku v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See also Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (interpreting A.R.S.
Heritage v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Heritage v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 12-913 “has been construed as also allowing an appeal to the court of appeals, which was created after § 12-913 was enacted.” Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
State v. Hutchison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Hutchison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dept. of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶13 (App. 2014) (finding appellate jurisdiction under the Administrative Review Act for cases “permitted by law to be appealed from the superior court”) (quoting A.R.S.
Gonzales v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gonzales v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (A.R.S.
Pascarella v. Mesa Police Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pascarella v. Mesa Police Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 12-913 was enacted.” Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (collecting cases).
Doe v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Doe v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep't of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
Danam v. Az Board of Education Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Danam v. Az Board of Education Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep't of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
Fisher v. Asbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fisher v. Asbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (interpreting § 12-913 as permitting an appeal to this court).
McSo v. McLeo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
McSo v. McLeo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (construing § 12-913 as allowing an appeal to this court).
state/des v. Torres 431 P.3d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
state/des v. Torres 431 P.3d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep't of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
Drunasky v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Drunasky v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 15 (App. 2014).
McSo v. Duncanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McSo v. Duncanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (Reference to “supreme court” in § 12-913 “has been construed as also allowing an appeal to the court of appeals, which was created after § 12-913 was enacted.”).
Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (construing § 12-913 as allowing appeal to court of appeals).
Wassef v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners ex rel. Hugunin 393 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wassef v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners ex rel. Hugunin 393 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Department of Health Services 392 P.3d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Department of Health Services 392 P.3d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 12-913 "has been construed as also allowing an appeal to the court of appeals, which was created after § 12-913 was enacted.” Svendsen v. Ariz. Dept. of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., , 533 ¶ 13
Best v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Best v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 12-913 “has been construed as also allowing an appeal to the court of appeals, which was created after § 12-913 was enacted.” Svendsen v. Arizona Dept. of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
Houston v. Azsbe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017