Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Myrick v. Maloney, 333 P.3d 818.
-
Petramala v. Des
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
As such, “we presume the items not included in the appellate record support [the ALJ’s] ruling.” ¶ 11 (App. 2014) (“An appellant .
- Bergevin v. Bergevin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Bergevin v. Bergevin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Valente v. Valente Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Valente v. Valente Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Robinson v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Robinson v. Robinson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
[to] include in the record transcripts of all proceedings containing evidence relevant to that judgment, finding or conclusion”); ¶ 11 (App. 2014) (“We presume the items not included in the appellate record support a trial court’s ruling.”).
- Morrison v. Morrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Nackard v. Nackard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Nackard v. Nackard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Morrison v. Morrison
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-05 (App. 1995), ¶ 8 (App. 2014).
- Reyes v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Reyes v. Espinoza
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
While the superior court is not obligated to make findings of fact absent a request, ¶ 10 (App. 2014), it is required to examine both the financial resources and the reasonableness of the positions of each party.
- Seraphin v. Gilot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Seraphin v. Gilot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Langbehn v. Langbehn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Langbehn v. Langbehn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- National Equity v. Mwm Forever Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- National Equity v. Mwm Forever Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Carpenter v. Carpenter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Carpenter v. Carpenter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Sernas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Sernas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Bustos v. Covarrubias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Bustos v. Covarrubias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Porteous v. Francies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Porteous v. Francies
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 25-324, “after considering the financial resources of both parties and the reasonableness of the positions each party has taken through the proceedings.” ¶ 9 (App. 2014).
- Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Gonzales v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Gonzales v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Yacullo v. Cunniffe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Yacullo v. Cunniffe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Schenk v. Casebolt II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Schenk v. Casebolt II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Menghini v. Menghini
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
ed as separate or community, it remains such as long as it can continue to be segregated.” (“An asset that is separate property before marriage remains separate property after marriage until changed by agreement or operation of law.”), ¶ 8 (App. 2014).
- Stevens v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Stevens v. Stevens
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 6 (App. 2014) (attorney’s fees); ¶ 9 (App. 2007) (spousal maintenance).
- Wethe v. Wethe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Wethe v. Wethe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State Bar v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State Bar v. Berry
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
the unauthorized practice of law as defined by Rule 31.3 However, when an appellant “contend[s] on appeal that a judgment, finding or conclusion[] is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, the appellant must include in the record transcripts of all proceedings containing evidence relevant to that judgment, finding or conclusion.” ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2014) (“An appellant also has an obligation to provide transcripts and other documents necessary to consider the issu
- Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Stickler v. Stickler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Stickler v. Stickler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Peralta v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Peralta v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019