Cited by

–94 (App. 1995), ¶ 8 (App. 2014); (a party’s concealment of income or assets may be considered when dividing community property).

In the exercise of our discretion, ¶ 16 (App. 2014), we decline to award costs or fees to either party pursuant to A.R.S.

¶ 6 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 26 (App. 2011)).

(stating that the trial court correctly considered the “over $100,000 in temporary support” received by the wife during pendency of the dissolution petition as a reason to deny spousal maintenance), ¶ 8 (App. 2014).

¶ 9 (App. 2014); ¶ 34 (App. 2018) (“And because two factors must be considered, a neutral finding on one factor does not necessarily preclude an award.”).

¶ 9 (App. 2014); Nicaise, 2018 WL 1101654, at *8, ¶ 34 (“And because two factors must be considered, a neutral finding on one factor does not necessarily preclude an award.”).

¶ 11 (App. 2014) (missing transcripts are presumed to support the superior court’s decision).

Cf. Hrudka v. Hrudka , , 92, , 187 (App. 1995) (under doctrine of judicial estoppel, "a party who successfully asserts a particular position in one judicial proceeding will not be allowed to assert an inconsistent position in a subsequent proceeding"), superseded by statute on other grounds as recognized in Myrick v. Maloney , , ¶ 8

¶ 6 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 26 (App. 2011)).

§ 25–318(C)), ¶ 8 (App. 2014)).

superseded by statute on other grounds, ¶ 8 (App. 2014).

And when, as here, the appellant does not provide transcripts in support of an appeal, “[w]e presume the items not included in the appellate record support [the] trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 11 (App. 2014).

93 (App. 1995), ¶ 8 (App. 2014).

§ 25–318(C)), ¶ 8 (App. 2014)).

Schickner, 237 Ariz. at 197, ¶ 13 ( ¶ 8 (App. 2014)).

§ 25-324, ¶ 8 (App. 2014).

¶ 6, (citation omitted).

¶ 6 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 26 (App. 2011)).