DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Baker, 900 P.2d 764.

310 citing documents.

  • Li v. Zhao Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Li v. Zhao Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
  • Andrich v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ("A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts" and "we assume [missing transcripts] would support the court's findings and conclusions.").
  • Staker v. Staker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Staker v. Staker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Schultz v. Schultz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Schultz v. Schultz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ARCAP 11(c)(1); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts,” and “we assume [missing transcripts] would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).
  • Schumacher v. Hargrave Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Schumacher v. Hargrave Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    We therefore assume the transcript “would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”
  • Mays v. Mwm Vicsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Mays v. Mwm Vicsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    “When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”
  • Watkins v. Lane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Engram v. Uaic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Engram v. Uaic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶ 9 (App. 2010) (); see also ARCAP 11(b)(1).
  • Watkins v. Lane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Lanier v. Hall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Lanier v. Hall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    See id.; see also ARCAP 11(a) (outlining the composition of the “record on appeal”); (“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusion.”).
  • Carrion v. Carrion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Carrion v. Carrion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Koizumi v. Morogiello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Koizumi v. Morogiello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Peralta v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Peralta v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Palestina v. McMillin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Palestina v. McMillin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    As such, we “presume the items not included in the appellate record support [the] trial court’s ruling.” Id.; ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B).
  • Petramala v. Des Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Criticized Petramala v. Des Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    has an obligation to provide transcripts and other documents necessary to consider the issues raised on appeal.”); ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B).
  • Perez v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Perez v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Luvisi v. Ellison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Luvisi v. Ellison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    see also ARCAP 11(c); ¶ 13 (App. 2001) (“When there is no request for findings and the trial court does not make specific findings of fact, we must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its [ruling] and must affirm if any reasonable c
  • Brandon J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Brandon J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Gagnon v. Greene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Gagnon v. Greene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (explaining appellate court presumes that missing portions of the record support the superior court’s decision).
  • Lemay v. Lemay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Lemay v. Lemay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Carey v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Carey v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Jardines v. Hon. ryan-touhill/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Jardines v. Hon. ryan-touhill/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues .
  • Moncur v. Moncur Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Ruinard, Jr. v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Ruinard, Jr. v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Moncur v. Moncur Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” (citing ARCAP 11)).
  • Collins v. Glick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Collins v. Glick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ARCAP 11(c); ¶ 13 (App. 2001) (“When there is no request for findings and the trial court does not make specific findings of fact, we must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its [ruling] and must affirm if any reasonable c
  • Cordero v. Hazlitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021