Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Baker, 900 P.2d 764.
-
Hawkins v. Hawkins
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See ARCAP 11(c); (holding we may assume the court’s findings are supported by the record when the parties fail to provide the relevant transcripts).
- Nunez v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Nunez v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Layton v. Layton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
Layton v. Layton
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 8 n.1 (App. 2005) ( ).
- Crook v. Crook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
Crook v. Crook
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Although we presume that a missing transcript “support[s] the court’s findings and conclusions[,]” no such presumption applies here because the court made no findings about Father’s payment of child support during the modification proceedings.
- Morgal v. Stobbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
Morgal v. Stobbs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.” (citation omitted); accord ARCAP 3 MORGAL v. STOBBS Decision of the Court 11(c)(1)(B).
- Canon v. Retail Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Canon v. Retail Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Gallegos v. Wildenstein Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Gallegos v. Wildenstein
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
When a party fails to provide a transcript, we must assume the court “evaluated all relevant factors and made any necessary findings to support its ruling,” Aguirre v. Robert Forrest, P.A., and that the transcripts “would support the court’s findings and conclusions,”
- Wilcox v. Wilcox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Wilcox v. Wilcox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Morales v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Morales v. Morales
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
“The Guidelines do not otherwise define ordinary and necessary business expenses.”
- Farnsworth v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Farnsworth v. Moore
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
("When a party fails to include [transcripts or other necessary documents], we assume they would support the court's findings and conclusions.").
- Allen v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Allen v. Adot
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
- Boozer v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Boozer v. Boozer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(providing that because an appellant “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [the appellate court] to consider the issues raised on appeal[,]” the appellate court will “assume” that missing portions of the record “would support t
- Ez Homes v. Mall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Ez Homes v. Mall
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See ARCAP 11(c)(1) (“The appellant must order transcripts of superior court proceedings not already in the official record that the appellant deems necessary for proper consideration of the issues on appeal.”); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
- Mohave v. Messner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Mohave v. Messner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Jackson v. Rush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Jackson v. Rush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- state/carlos v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
state/carlos v. Lewis
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“[T]he appellant [has the] burden to ensure that ‘the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.’” ¶ 9 (App. 2010) ().
- Beck v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Beck v. Pino
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
If an appellant fails to do so, “we assume [any missing transcript or record item] would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”
- Wright v. Mailatyar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Wright v. Mailatyar
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).
- Garza v. Collinsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Garza v. Collinsworth
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal,” and “[w]hen a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).
- Collier v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Nextgear v. Owens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Collier v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Nextgear v. Owens
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
1 The Owens did not provide hearing transcripts, and “we assume [the missing transcripts] would support the court’s findings and conclusions.” ARCAP 11.
- Nickel v. Potter 537 P.3d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Motley v. Simmons 537 P.3d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Nickel v. Potter
537 P.3d 813
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
-
Motley v. Simmons
537 P.3d 807
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
see also ARCAP 11(c) (noting appellant has a duty to order relevant transcripts).
- Arizona Republican Party v. Richer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Arizona Republican Party v. Richer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”); see also ARCAP 11(c) (explaining the appellant’s duty to order transcripts).
- Andrich v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023