Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Baker, 900 P.2d 764.
-
Brandon J. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
- Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Gagnon v. Greene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Gagnon v. Greene
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(explaining appellate court presumes that missing portions of the record support the superior court’s decision).
- Lemay v. Lemay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Lemay v. Lemay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Carey v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Carey v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Jardines v. Hon. ryan-touhill/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Jardines v. Hon. ryan-touhill/state
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues .
- Moncur v. Moncur Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Ruinard, Jr. v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Ruinard, Jr. v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Moncur v. Moncur
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” (citing ARCAP 11)).
- Collins v. Glick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Collins v. Glick
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
ARCAP 11(c); ¶ 13 (App. 2001) (“When there is no request for findings and the trial court does not make specific findings of fact, we must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its [ruling] and must affirm if any reasonable c
- Cordero v. Hazlitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Cordero v. Hazlitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Yurcaba, III v. Yurcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Yurcaba, III v. Yurcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Toller v. Toller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Toller v. Toller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Fuess v. Fuess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Fuess v. Fuess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Secure Ventures v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Secure Ventures v. Johnson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
DISCUSSION ¶9 As a preliminary matter, we note that an appealing “party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.”
- Stuart v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Stuart v. Scottsdale
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶17 We therefore need not address Stuart’s various contentions of trial error in the admission of testimony and portions of the superior court’s rulings on his motions for new trial, (“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).
- Troska v. Petramala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Troska v. Petramala
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“It is the appellant’s burden to ensure that ‘the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.’ And, in the absence of a transcript, we presume the evidence and arguments presented at the hearing support the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 9 (App. 2010) ().
- Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Schmitzer v. Schmitzer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Schmitzer v. Schmitzer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Frederick v. Barreira Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Frederick v. Barreira Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Helmreich v. Ahc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Helmreich v. Ahc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Thompson v. Burton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Thompson v. Burton
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See ARCAP 11(b)(1); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
- Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State Bar v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State Bar v. Berry
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
the evidence, the appellant must include in the record transcripts of all proceedings containing evidence relevant to that judgment, finding or conclusion.” ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2014) (“An appellant also has an obligation to provide transcripts and other documents necessary to consider the issues raised on appeal.”) ().
- Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Hefner v. Hefner
456 P.3d 20
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Because we are unable to review the evidence, we assume it would support the court’s findings and conclusions, including the court’s finding that Wife’s expert testified that he did not know if the business value had increased and acknowledged the value could have decreased.
- Faries v. Faries, II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019