Cited by

DISCUSSION ¶9 As a preliminary matter, we note that an appealing “party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.”

¶17 We therefore need not address Stuart’s various contentions of trial error in the admission of testimony and portions of the superior court’s rulings on his motions for new trial, (“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).

“It is the appellant’s burden to ensure that ‘the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.’ And, in the absence of a transcript, we presume the evidence and arguments presented at the hearing support the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 9 (App. 2010) ().

See ARCAP 11(b)(1); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).

the evidence, the appellant must include in the record transcripts of all proceedings containing evidence relevant to that judgment, finding or conclusion.” ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2014) (“An appellant also has an obligation to provide transcripts and other documents necessary to consider the issues raised on appeal.”) ().

Because we are unable to review the evidence, we assume it would support the court’s findings and conclusions, including the court’s finding that Wife’s expert testified that he did not know if the business value had increased and acknowledged the value could have decreased.

Because Kurtz did not provide a transcript of the proceedings, we “presume the record supports the trial court’s rulings.” ¶ 8 n.1 (App. 2005) (); see also ARCAP 11(b)-(c) (stating the appellant is responsible for ensuring “the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal”).

Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure ("ARCAP") 11(c)(1)(A), (B); ¶ 9 (App. 2010)

§ 13-3918, which, he argues, rendered the seizure warrant expired and contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” (citing ARCAP 11).

1 New York Mellon’s answering brief states that “Mr. Backholm testified in his defense at the hearing.” An appellant is required to “mak[e] certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(c).

See ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B) (“If the appellant will contend on appeal that a judgment, finding or conclusion, is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, appellant must include in the record transcripts of all proceedings containing evidence relevant to that judgment, finding or conclusion.”); (appellant is responsible for providing the necessary transcripts for this court to consider the issues raised on appeal); Romero v. Sw.