Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Baker, 900 P.2d 764.

328 citing documents.

  • Brandon J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Gagnon v. Greene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Gagnon v. Greene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (explaining appellate court presumes that missing portions of the record support the superior court’s decision).
  • Lemay v. Lemay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Lemay v. Lemay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Carey v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Carey v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Jardines v. Hon. ryan-touhill/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Jardines v. Hon. ryan-touhill/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues .
  • Moncur v. Moncur Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Ruinard, Jr. v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Ruinard, Jr. v. Scroggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Moncur v. Moncur Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” (citing ARCAP 11)).
  • Collins v. Glick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Collins v. Glick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ARCAP 11(c); ¶ 13 (App. 2001) (“When there is no request for findings and the trial court does not make specific findings of fact, we must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its [ruling] and must affirm if any reasonable c
  • Cordero v. Hazlitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Cordero v. Hazlitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Yurcaba, III v. Yurcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Yurcaba, III v. Yurcaba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Toller v. Toller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Toller v. Toller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Fuess v. Fuess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Fuess v. Fuess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Secure Ventures v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Secure Ventures v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    DISCUSSION ¶9 As a preliminary matter, we note that an appealing “party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.”
  • Stuart v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Stuart v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶17 We therefore need not address Stuart’s various contentions of trial error in the admission of testimony and portions of the superior court’s rulings on his motions for new trial, (“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).
  • Troska v. Petramala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Troska v. Petramala Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    “It is the appellant’s burden to ensure that ‘the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.’ And, in the absence of a transcript, we presume the evidence and arguments presented at the hearing support the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 9 (App. 2010) ().
  • Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Schmitzer v. Schmitzer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Schmitzer v. Schmitzer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Frederick v. Barreira Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Frederick v. Barreira Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Helmreich v. Ahc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Helmreich v. Ahc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Thompson v. Burton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Thompson v. Burton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See ARCAP 11(b)(1); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
  • Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State Bar v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State Bar v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    the evidence, the appellant must include in the record transcripts of all proceedings containing evidence relevant to that judgment, finding or conclusion.” ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2014) (“An appellant also has an obligation to provide transcripts and other documents necessary to consider the issues raised on appeal.”) ().
  • Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Because we are unable to review the evidence, we assume it would support the court’s findings and conclusions, including the court’s finding that Wife’s expert testified that he did not know if the business value had increased and acknowledged the value could have decreased.
  • Faries v. Faries, II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019