Cited by

(explaining the appellant “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [the court] to consider the issues raised on appeal”); accord ARCAP 11(b).

Husband bore the burden of ensuring the record on appeal contained all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised, see ARCAP 11(b)(2), (c)(1)(A), and because he has failed to provide this court a transcript of the November 4 hearing, we assume the missing transcript would support the court’s findings and conclusions

¶ 24 Likewise, , does not support DOS’s contention that we must presume the omitted transcript from the August 2016 motion to withdraw hearing supports the court’s “implicit finding” that Tammy had been warned about the consequences of representing herself.

(in the absence of a transcript, appellate court assumes the transcript would support the superior court’s judgment, findings, and conclusions) (citation omitted).

¶4 As the appellant, Father “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see ARCAP 11(c) (explaining the duty of the appellant to order certified transcripts).

(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”) (citation omitted); see also ARCAP 11.

“[W]here an incomplete record is presented to an appellate court, the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.” n.2 (1978)

“[W]here an incomplete record is presented to an appellate court, the missing portions of that record are to be presumed to support the action of the trial court.” Cullison, 120 Ariz. at 168 n.2

Further, the Stefanoviches failed to provide this court with transcripts from the superior court proceedings, notwithstanding their burden to ensure “the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see Ariz. R. Civ.

¶7 Furthermore, as the appellant, Wife “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” (“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”) (citing In re Mustonen’s Estate, ); see also ARCAP 11(c)(1)(A)-(B) (stating it is the appellant’s duty to order, and include in the record, transcripts of

Consequently, we must assume the missing items support the court’s findings and conclusions.4

(in the absence of a transcript, reviewing court assumes the record supports the superior court's decision) (citing ARCAP 11(b)).

¶7 Furthermore, as the appellant, Father “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see ARCAP 11(b) (explaining the duty of the appellant to order certified transcripts).

As the appellant, Pollard bears the burden to ensure “the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(b)(c).