DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Baker, 900 P.2d 764.

310 citing documents.

  • Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Longariello v. Aura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Longariello v. Aura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Toth v. Brower Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Mendenhall v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Mendenhall v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Toth v. Brower Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (“When a party fails to include necessary items [in the record on appeal], we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).
  • In Re Mh2015-000579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • In Re Mh2015-000579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003); -42, ¶ 19 (App. 1998); ).
  • Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Flynn v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Flynn v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    As the appellant, Mother “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B) (appellant must include transcripts on appeal if contending that a judgment, finding, or conclusion is unsupported by or contrary to the evidence).
  • Flynn v. Rodrick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Flynn v. Rodrick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.” (internal citations omitted); see also ARCAP 11(b); n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005); ¶ 11 (App. 1998).
  • Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Claassen 357 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Claassen 357 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Vasquez-Araiza v. Gurrola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Vasquez-Araiza v. Gurrola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (“Where the record is incomplete, a reviewing court must assume any evidence not available on appeal supported the trial court’s action.”).
  • Jm Homes v. Empire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Jm Homes v. Empire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (when a party fails to include entire record on appeal, appellate court assumes the missing portions would support the trial court’s findings and conclusions).
  • Bank of Ny v. St. John Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Bank of Ny v. St. John Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    See Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure (ARCAP) 11(b)(1); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Palisades v. Roberto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Palisades v. Roberto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Additionally, it is the Appellant's burden to ensure that “the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.” see also ARCAP 13(a).
  • Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    As the appellant, Cortes “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(b) (explaining duty of appellant to order certified transcripts).
  • Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    See ARCAP 11(b)(1); (assuming that an unfurnished transcript would support the family court’s findings and conclusions).
  • Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    As the appellant, Mother “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(b) (explaining duty of appellant to order certified transcripts).
  • Collins v. Azdwm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Collins v. Azdwm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    v. Burton, ¶ 16, (noting appellant’s responsibility to ensure complete record on appeal and holding “[w]hen a party fails to do so, we assume the missing portions of the record would support the [ALJ]’s findings and conclusions” ( )).
  • City of Phoenix v. Elgin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • City of Phoenix v. Elgin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    See ARCAP 11(b)(1); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).
  • Strovink v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Strovink v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    (affirming decision in the absence of a transcript).
  • Smith v. Frederick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Smith v. Frederick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    (noting where appellant fails to ensure record on appeal contains necessary information, we presume the missing information supports the court’s ruling).
  • Jacobson v. Jacobson-Boettcher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Jacobson v. Jacobson-Boettcher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”
  • Gillespie-Muldrew v. Muldrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014