DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Baker, 900 P.2d 764.

328 citing documents.

  • Thomas v. Njie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶7 Furthermore, as the appellant, Wife “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” (“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”) (citing In re Mustonen’s Estate, ); see also ARCAP 11(c)(1)(A)-(B) (stating it is the appellant’s duty to order, and include in the record, transcripts of
  • Prescott v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Prescott v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Consequently, we must assume the missing items support the court’s findings and conclusions.4
  • Leone v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Leone v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Kambourian v. Kambourian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Kambourian v. Kambourian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (in the absence of a transcript, reviewing court assumes the record supports the superior court's decision) (citing ARCAP 11(b)).
  • Jones v. Bell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Jones v. Bell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶7 Furthermore, as the appellant, Father “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see ARCAP 11(b) (explaining the duty of the appellant to order certified transcripts).
  • Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • McClure v. McClure Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Wootton v. Blair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Mangis v. Ulmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Wootton v. Blair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • McClure v. McClure Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Mangis v. Ulmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    As the appellant, Pollard bears the burden to ensure “the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(b)(c).
  • Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Longariello v. Aura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Longariello v. Aura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Toth v. Brower Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Mendenhall v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Toth v. Brower Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (“When a party fails to include necessary items [in the record on appeal], we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).
  • Mendenhall v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • In Re Mh2015-000579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • In Re Mh2015-000579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003); -42, ¶ 19 (App. 1998); ).
  • Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Flynn v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Flynn v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    As the appellant, Mother “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B) (appellant must include transcripts on appeal if contending that a judgment, finding, or conclusion is unsupported by or contrary to the evidence).
  • Flynn v. Rodrick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Flynn v. Rodrick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.” (internal citations omitted); see also ARCAP 11(b); n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2005); ¶ 11 (App. 1998).
  • Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Claassen 357 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Claassen 357 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Vasquez-Araiza v. Gurrola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Vasquez-Araiza v. Gurrola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (“Where the record is incomplete, a reviewing court must assume any evidence not available on appeal supported the trial court’s action.”).
  • Jm Homes v. Empire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Jm Homes v. Empire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (when a party fails to include entire record on appeal, appellate court assumes the missing portions would support the trial court’s findings and conclusions).
  • Bank of Ny v. St. John Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Bank of Ny v. St. John Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    See Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure (ARCAP) 11(b)(1); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Palisades v. Roberto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Palisades v. Roberto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Additionally, it is the Appellant's burden to ensure that “the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.” see also ARCAP 13(a).
  • Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015