Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Baker, 900 P.2d 764.

310 citing documents.

Gillespie-Muldrew v. Muldrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”
Dominguez v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Schlueter v. Haskell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Schlueter v. Haskell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Dominguez v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Olade v. Olade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Olade v. Olade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Myrick v. Maloney 333 P.3d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Myrick v. Maloney 333 P.3d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Stevens v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Stevens v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(we assume missing transcript supports trial court’s ruling).
Hanson v. Whetten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Hanson v. Whetten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kost v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kost v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juenger v. Nyahay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juenger v. Nyahay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See ARCAP 13(a)(5) (stating that arguments on appeal shall contain “citation to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”)
Burch & Cracchiolo v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Burch & Cracchiolo v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).
Hillegass v. Garmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Hillegass v. Garmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Reeck v. Mendoza 304 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Reeck v. Mendoza 304 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(appellant is responsible for ensuring record contains transcripts necessary to consider issues on appeal; if appellant fails to include necessary transcripts, appellate court presumes they would support superior court’s findings).
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
In Re the Marriage of Priessman 266 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In Re the Marriage of Priessman 266 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Marriage of MacMillan v. Schwartz 250 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Marriage of MacMillan v. Schwartz 250 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Blair v. Burgener 245 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Blair v. Burgener 245 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
It is the appellant’s burden to ensure that “the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.” , see also Ariz. R. Civ.App.
Cardinal & Stachel, PC v. Curtiss 238 P.3d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Cardinal & Stachel, PC v. Curtiss 238 P.3d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
As the appellant, the law firm was obligated to ”mak[e] certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.” , see also Ariz. R. Civ.App.
Kline v. Kline 212 P.3d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Kline v. Kline 212 P.3d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
13 “When no transcript is provided on appeal, the reviewing court assumes that the record supports the trial court’s decision.” ¶ 11 , ( , ).
Manu Dube v. Chandra S. Desai and Patricia Desai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Manu Dube v. Chandra S. Desai and Patricia Desai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
When the necessary items are omitted, “we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”
Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 158 P.3d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 158 P.3d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
LaWALL v. PIMA COUNTY MERIT COMMISSION And SCAMMON 134 P.3d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
LaWALL v. PIMA COUNTY MERIT COMMISSION And SCAMMON 134 P.3d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Romero v. Southwest Ambulance, rural/metro, City of Tucson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Romero v. Southwest Ambulance, rural/metro, City of Tucson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
See Baker v. Baker, 183 Ariz. 70, 73, (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.
Marriage of Kohler v. Kohler 118 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Marriage of Kohler v. Kohler 118 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Pence v. Glacy 87 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Pence v. Glacy 87 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Burton 66 P.3d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003