Cited by

As the appellant, Cortes “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(b) (explaining duty of appellant to order certified transcripts).

See ARCAP 11(b)(1); (assuming that an unfurnished transcript would support the family court’s findings and conclusions).

As the appellant, Mother “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [this Court] to consider the issues raised on appeal.” see also ARCAP 11(b) (explaining duty of appellant to order certified transcripts).

v. Burton, ¶ 16, (noting appellant’s responsibility to ensure complete record on appeal and holding “[w]hen a party fails to do so, we assume the missing portions of the record would support the [ALJ]’s findings and conclusions” ( )).

See ARCAP 11(b)(1); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).

(affirming decision in the absence of a transcript).

(noting where appellant fails to ensure record on appeal contains necessary information, we presume the missing information supports the court’s ruling).

“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”

“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”

(we assume missing transcript supports trial court’s ruling).

See ARCAP 13(a)(5) (stating that arguments on appeal shall contain “citation to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”)

(“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).

(appellant is responsible for ensuring record contains transcripts necessary to consider issues on appeal; if appellant fails to include necessary transcripts, appellate court presumes they would support superior court’s findings).