Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.
- State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 329 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2014
- State v. Varela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Varela
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19, ( ).
- State v. Cummings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Cummings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Summers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Summers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Angel O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Angel O. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 22, ¶¶ 17-18, ; 858, P.2d 1152, 1191 (1993) (when objections were raised in the family court, the harmless error standard is applied).
- State v. Creasey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Mucciarone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Mucciarone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Creasey
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Because the objection was preserved we review for harmless error, ¶ 18, and the State has the burden to show that the guilty verdict rendered was surely unattributable to the error, see Anthony, 218 Ariz. at 446, ¶ 39, 189 P.3d at 373.
- State v. Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Maldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Maldonado
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19, ( ).
-
State v. Webb
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
–68, ¶¶ 19–20, –08 (2005).
- State of Arizona v. Vincent Michael Allen 326 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Vincent Michael Allen 326 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Chavez-Tavena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Chavez-Tavena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Martinez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 19, (“Fundamental error review .
- State of Arizona v. Veronica Sanchez-Equihua 326 P.3d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Veronica Sanchez-Equihua 326 P.3d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State v. Buruato Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Buruato Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Roberts
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
§ 13-610.” n.6, ¶ 39, n.6 (2005) (Hurwitz, J., concurring) (“An appellate court may find fundamental error even if the issue is not raised on appeal by a defendant.”); ¶ 14, (holding that A.R.S.
- State v. Sandoval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Sandoval
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In establishing fundamental error, a defendant must show “both that fundamental error exists and that the error in his case caused him prejudice.” ¶ 20
- State v. Leyba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Leyba
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“To establish fundamental error, [a defendant] must show that the error complained of goes to the foundation of [the] case, takes away a right that is essential to [the] defense, and is of such magnitude that [the defendant] could not have received a fair trial.” ¶ 24
- State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Mekhail Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Mekhail
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-68, ¶¶ 19-22, -08 (2005).
- State of Arizona v. Victor Kyle Lizardi 323 P.3d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Victor Kyle Lizardi 323 P.3d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014