Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1723 citing documents.

State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Curtis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Curtis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In Re Fernando R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Crandall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Crandall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
When a party fails to object properly, we review solely for fundamental error.”); ¶ 19
In Re Fernando R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
to justify a reversal of her adjudication based on a claim she failed to raise below”); ¶¶ 19-20, (“Fundamental error review .
State v. Large 321 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia-Quintana 321 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Morales-Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Morales-Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Large 321 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
C. The Error Here is Harmless ¶ 17 ¶ 19 , the State argues that we should review only for fundamental error because Large failed to object or to present the issue below.
State v. Garcia-Quintana 321 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-68, ¶¶ 19-20, -08 (2005).
State v. Israel Joseph Naranjo 321 P.3d 398 Ariz. 2014
State v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Israel Joseph Naranjo 321 P.3d 398 Ariz. 2014
State v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 30, “Harmless error review places the burden on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict or sentence.” ¶ 18
State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Grossman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19, ( ).
State v. Grossman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- 68, ¶¶ 19-20, -08 (2005).
State v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Bassett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Bassett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Tittle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Tittle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“To establish fundamental error, [a defendant] must show that the error complained of goes to the foundation of his case, takes away a right that is essential to his defense, and is of such magnitude that he could not have received a fair trial.” ¶ 24
State v. Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19, ( ).
State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. William Craig Miller 316 P.3d 1219 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. William Craig Miller 316 P.3d 1219 Ariz. 2013
State v. Gonzales 314 P.3d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Gonzales 314 P.3d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Dickinson 314 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Dickinson 314 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State of Arizona v. Carlos J. Torres 314 P.3d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by