Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1723 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Carlos J. Torres 314 P.3d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. George 313 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. George 313 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State of Arizona v. Christian Betza Vasquez 311 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Guillermo E. Cooney 312 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Christian Betza Vasquez 311 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Guillermo E. Cooney 312 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Angelino Paolo Buccheri-Bianca 312 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Angelino Paolo Buccheri-Bianca 312 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider 311 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin 310 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider 311 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin 310 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown 310 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown 310 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Such exists only in “those rare cases that involve ‘error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.’” State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, ¶ 19
State v. Yazzie 307 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Yazzie 307 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 11 “Harmless error review places the burden on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict or sentence.” ¶ 18
State v. Hines 307 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Hines 307 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-68, ¶¶ 19-20 , -08 (2005), -35, ¶ 4 , -84 (App.2008), we must review only for fundamental error because Hines’s objection at trial was not directed to the characterization of the class 5 felony as a lesser-included offense.
State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio Perez 308 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio Perez 308 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
¶¶ 19-20, (failure to object to alleged error in trial court results in forfeiture of review for all but fundamental error).
State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Trent Christopher Benson 307 P.3d 19 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Trent Christopher Benson 307 P.3d 19 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Robert Hernandez 305 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Robert Hernandez 305 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2013
State v. Buot 306 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Buot 306 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Reyes 307 P.3d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Reyes 307 P.3d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-Mercado 304 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-Mercado 304 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. Williams 302 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Williams 302 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
“To prevail under this standard of review, [Williams] must establish both that fundamental error exists and that the error in his ease caused him prejudice.” ¶ 20
State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro Delgado 303 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro Delgado 303 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. McDonagh 304 P.3d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. McDonagh 304 P.3d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State of Arizona v. Albert Junior Lopez 298 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Albert Junior Lopez 298 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Edward James Rose 297 P.3d 906 Ariz. 2013
State of Arizona v. Edward James Rose 297 P.3d 906 Ariz. 2013
State v. James 297 P.3d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. James 297 P.3d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
James has shown fundamental error resulting in prejudice.
State of Arizona v. Joseph Lawrence Dixon 294 P.3d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Joseph Lawrence Dixon 294 P.3d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Anthony Duran 293 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Anthony Duran 293 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, ¶ 18
State of Arizona v. Manuel Ovante, Jr. 291 P.3d 974 Ariz. 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by