Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.
- State v. Bassett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Tittle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Tittle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Craft
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“To establish fundamental error, [a defendant] must show that the error complained of goes to the foundation of his case, takes away a right that is essential to his defense, and is of such magnitude that he could not have received a fair trial.” ¶ 24
-
State v. Gallegos
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19, ( ).
- State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
- State of Arizona v. Shawna Forde 315 P.3d 1200 Ariz. 2014
- State of Arizona v. William Craig Miller 316 P.3d 1219 Ariz. 2013
- State of Arizona v. William Craig Miller 316 P.3d 1219 Ariz. 2013
- State v. Gonzales 314 P.3d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State v. Gonzales 314 P.3d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State v. Dickinson 314 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State v. Dickinson 314 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State of Arizona v. Carlos J. Torres 314 P.3d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Carlos J. Torres 314 P.3d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State v. George 313 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State v. George 313 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State of Arizona v. Christian Betza Vasquez 311 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Guillermo E. Cooney 312 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Christian Betza Vasquez 311 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Guillermo E. Cooney 312 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Angelino Paolo Buccheri-Bianca 312 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Angelino Paolo Buccheri-Bianca 312 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider 311 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin 310 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Daniel Andrew Snider 311 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Larin 310 P.3d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown 310 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown
310 P.3d 29
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Such exists only in “those rare cases that involve ‘error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.’” State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, ¶ 19
- State v. Yazzie 307 P.3d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
State v. Yazzie
307 P.3d 1042
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 11 “Harmless error review places the burden on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict or sentence.” ¶ 18
- State v. Hines 307 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
State v. Hines
307 P.3d 1034
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-68, ¶¶ 19-20 , -08 (2005), -35, ¶ 4 , -84 (App.2008), we must review only for fundamental error because Hines’s objection at trial was not directed to the characterization of the class 5 felony as a lesser-included offense.
- State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio Perez 308 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio Perez
308 P.3d 1189
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
¶¶ 19-20, (failure to object to alleged error in trial court results in forfeiture of review for all but fundamental error).
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
- State of Arizona v. Trent Christopher Benson 307 P.3d 19 Ariz. 2013
- State of Arizona v. Trent Christopher Benson 307 P.3d 19 Ariz. 2013
- State of Arizona v. Robert Hernandez 305 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2013
- State of Arizona v. Robert Hernandez 305 P.3d 378 Ariz. 2013
- State v. Buot 306 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State v. Buot 306 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
- State v. Reyes 307 P.3d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013