Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. West, 250 P.3d 1188.

680 citing documents.

State v. Jamison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Jamison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Fichtelman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Fichtelman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
We, therefore, ask only whether the record contains “substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.” ¶ 14 (2011).
State v. Floyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Floyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Piper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Piper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Harrington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Harrington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Jumper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Jumper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Patten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Patten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Evidence, whether direct or circumstantial, suffices to support a conviction if “reasonable persons could accept [the proof] as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011) (citation omitted).
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Brevetti v. Brevetti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lujan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lujan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Brevetti v. Brevetti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 15 (2011); Hurd, 223 Ariz. at 52 ¶ 16.
State v. Cline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Cline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Andersen 531 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Andersen 531 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
P. 20(a)(1); ¶ 14 (2011).
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶22 “[E]vidence to support a conviction exists when ‘reasonable persons could accept [it] as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of [a] defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” ¶ 72 (2015) ( ¶ 16 (2011)).
State v. Lohmeier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lohmeier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State of Arizona v. George Willie Rios 528 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. George Willie Rios 528 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
It requires “such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,” (quoting Mathers, 165 Ariz. at 67).
State v. Aguirre 527 P.3d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Aguirre 527 P.3d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Olivier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Olivier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 16 (2011) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
State v. Newman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Newman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Gollihar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Gollihar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Gaspar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gaspar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. Brian Matthew MacHardy 521 P.3d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State of Arizona v. Brian Matthew MacHardy 521 P.3d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State v. Farnberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Farnberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gomes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gomes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022