Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Homer Ray Roseberry, 353 P.3d 847.

87 citing documents.

State v. Quintero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
We will affirm the superior court’s decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Plaza-Uzeta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Plaza-Uzeta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶5 The court reviews the superior court’s decision for an abuse of discretion and will uphold that decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015) (citations omitted).
State v. Friedel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Friedel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
We will affirm the superior court’s decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Alvarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Alvarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Barnes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Barnes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Dixson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Dixson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶6 We review the superior court’s decision on a PCR petition for an abuse of discretion and will affirm if the decision “is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Stryker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Stryker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
This Court “review[s] a trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief for abuse of discretion” and will affirm the “decision if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015) (citations omitted).
State v. Sizemore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Sizemore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
DISCUSSION ¶5 This court reviews the superior court’s decision for an abuse of discretion and will uphold that decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015) (citing cases).
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
We will affirm the superior court’s decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Nunez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Nunez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
We will affirm the superior court’s decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Crockett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Crockett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
We will affirm the superior court’s decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Plaza-Uzeta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Plaza-Uzeta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶5 The court reviews the superior court’s decision for an abuse of discretion and will uphold that decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015) (citations omitted).
State v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
We will affirm the superior court’s decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Garland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Garland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
We will uphold the court’s decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Freeny Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Freeny Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
DISCUSSION ¶8 This court reviews the PCR court’s decision for an abuse of discretion and must uphold that decision if it is “legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Russo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
3 STATE v. MOORE Decision of the Court decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Russo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
We will uphold the superior court’s decision “if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
DISCUSSION ¶6 We review the superior court’s decision to deny a petition for PCR for an abuse of discretion, and we will affirm that decision if it is “legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015) (citation omitted).
State v. Rady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Rady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
This court will affirm a trial court’s ruling if “it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015) ().
State v. Worrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Worrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
This court will affirm a trial court’s ruling if “it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015) (citation omitted).
State v. Qureshi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Qureshi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
DISCUSSION ¶10 We review the superior court’s decision to deny post-conviction relief for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 6 (App. 2021), and we will affirm the superior court if the decision “is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Threadgill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Threadgill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the superior court’s decision to deny post-conviction relief for an abuse of discretion, and we will affirm the superior court if the decision “is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015).
State v. Sharp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Sharp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Jacobs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Jacobs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
And “[w]e will affirm a trial court’s decision if it is legally correct for any reason.” ¶ 7 (2015) ().
State of Arizona v. Timothy Hagerty 528 P.3d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. Timothy Hagerty 528 P.3d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State v. Lowery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023