Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carver, 771 P.2d 1382.

370 citing documents.

State v. Buttita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Buttita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Bare allegations of bias and prejudice, unsupported by factual evidence, are insufficient to overcome the presumption of impartiality and do not require recusal.”
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Samuels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Samuels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(failure to develop legal argument waives argument on review); (“In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.
Heuchan v. Lipko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Heuchan v. Lipko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) 4 HEUCHAN v. LIPKO Decision of the Court CONCLUSION ¶9 For the foregoing reasons, we
State v. Westerfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Westerfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (opening brief “shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied on.”); (“[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.
John Fitzgerald v. Hon. myers/state Ex Rel Brnovich Ariz. 2017
John Fitzgerald v. Hon. myers/state Ex Rel Brnovich Ariz. 2017
Reyes v. pinnacle/standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Reyes v. pinnacle/standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (requiring appellant’s brief to contain arguments with “citations of legal authorities and appropriate references to the portions of the record on which the appellant relies”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
Sign Here v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sign Here v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 23 (2009) (“Generally, we do not address arguments raised in the trial court but not in the court of appeals.”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
Calabrese v. Fortin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Calabrese v. Fortin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.’” n.9, ¶ 101 (2004) ().
Taborsha W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Taborsha W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(claims not raised in an opening brief are usually waived).
Rodrick v. Ellis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Rodrick v. Ellis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
Darci v. v. Dcs, M.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Darci v. v. Dcs, M.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
Jose S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jose S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (requiring appellant’s brief to contain arguments with “citations of legal authorities and appropriate references to the portions of the record on which the appellant relies.”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citation omitted).
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
("Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
Csizmadia v. Natl peo/the Mint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Csizmadia v. Natl peo/the Mint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (requiring appellant’s brief to contain arguments with “citations of legal authorities and appropriate references to the portions of the record on which the appellant relies”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
State of Arizona v. Matthew Thomas Snyder 382 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Matthew Thomas Snyder 382 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
¶25 “Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stacey M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stacey M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(“[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.”).
Summer P. v. Shirley M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Summer P. v. Shirley M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hemming v. mccarthy/arch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hemming v. mccarthy/arch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (requiring appellant’s brief to contain arguments that include “citations of legal authorities and appropriate references to the portions of the record on which the appellant relies.”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
Carlos O. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Carlos O. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(failure to argue claim constitutes waiver and abandonment of that claim) (citations omitted).
State v. Durazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Durazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); (providing that failing to sufficiently argue and support an argument on appeal waives it).
Glen S. v. Dcs, P.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Glen S. v. Dcs, P.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(failure to argue claim on appeal constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim).