Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carver, 771 P.2d 1382.

370 citing documents.

Trevor H., Jamie W. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Trevor H., Jamie W. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(failure to argue claim on appeal constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim).
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Webster Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Webster Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.9, ¶ 101, n.9 (2004) ( ).
State v. Havatone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Havatone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jon D., Kristie W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jon D., Kristie W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶33 We will review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal only if “we may clearly determine from the record that the ineffective assistance claim is meritless.” ().
State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.”); n.9, ¶ 101, n.9 (2004) (“In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.”) ( ); ¶ 8, (issue waived because defendant failed to develop argument in his brief).
State v. Holmes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Holmes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.”
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); ¶ 17, (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Appearance of interest or prejudice is more than the speculation suggested by the defendant.
State v. Olsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Olsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
[a]n argument which shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citations omitted).
State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
D'Ambrosio v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
D'Ambrosio v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
("In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant's 5 D'AMBROSIO v. PHOENIX, et al. Decision of the Court position on the issues raised.
State v. Spurling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Spurling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
[a]n argument which shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.”); (“failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim”) (citations omitted).
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶8 A defendant has a due process right “to have the trial presided over by a judge who is completely impartial and free of bias or prejudice.” ¶ 35
State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian Burns 344 P.3d 303 Ariz. 2015
State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian Burns 344 P.3d 303 Ariz. 2015
A trial court may, (“[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶¶ 16-17, (defendant waives argument alleged error at trial constituted fundamental error when he fails to argue issue on appeal); (failure to argue claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of such claim) (citations omitted).
Sportway v. Livin Da Dream Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sportway v. Livin Da Dream Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
see also Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., n.1, ¶ 5, n.1 (2005) (stating the court of appeals may properly decline to address an issue raised for the first time in a reply brief).
State v. Greenberg 343 P.3d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Greenberg 343 P.3d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
see 8 ¶ 101 n.9, n.9 (2004) (explaining that “[m]erely mentioning an argument is not e
Shifflett v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shifflett v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.” see also ARCAP 13(a)(6).
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶16 “In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.”
State v. Curtis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Curtis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n.9, ¶ 101, n.9 (2004) (failure to present “significant arguments, supported by authority” in opening brief waives issue) ( ).
State v. Kuder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Kuder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(noting informal motion for change of judge for cause under Rule 10.1, which did not comply with affidavit requirement, was insufficient).
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 311 P.3d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 311 P.3d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
(observing appellant always carries burden of demonstrating error); (noting failure to develop and support legal argument in accordance with Rule 31.13, Ariz. R. Crim.
In the Matter of Lisa M. Aubuchon 309 P.3d 886 Ariz. 2013
In the Matter of Lisa M. Aubuchon 309 P.3d 886 Ariz. 2013
We presume that a judge is impartial, and “the party seeking recusal must prove bias or prejudice by a preponderance of the evidence.”
State v. Okun 296 P.3d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Okun 296 P.3d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 101 n. 9, (opening brief must present significant arguments supported by authority, otherwise the party abandons and waives the claim) ( , ).