Cited by

¶ 9 (2012); Ariz. R. Civ.

We “assume the truth of all well-pleaded factual allegations and indulge all reasonable inferences from those facts, but mere conclusory statements are insufficient.” ¶ 9 (2012).

plaintiffs would not be entitled to relief under any interpretation of the facts susceptible of proof.” (quoting Fid.

¶ 9 (2012) (noting that a "complaint's exhibits, or public records regarding matters referenced in a complaint, are not 'outside the pleading,' and courts may consider such documents without converting a Rule [29(a)](6) motion into a summary judgment motion") ¶8 The court found that Husband only all

Two categories of documents are not “outside the pleadings.” These are “a complaint’s exhibits” and “public records regarding matters referenced in a complaint.” see also Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc., (noting case law not requiring conversion for documents “central to the complaint” but not attached to it, though also noting that Coleman arguably disapproves of this exception).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ¶2 On appeal from a motion to dismiss, we “must assume the truth of all well-pleaded factual allegations and indulge all reasonable inferences from those facts, but mere conclusory statements are insufficient.” ¶ 9 (2012).

P., we “assume the truth of all well-pleaded factual allegations.” ¶¶ 7-9 (2012).