Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1269 citing documents.

Jessi N., Ryan J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Abel v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Abel v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 27 (2000), and JS-6520, 157 Ariz. at 242).
Shawna N., John N. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shawna N., John N. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Silvino L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Silvino L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Keith R. v. Dcs, A.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Keith R. v. Dcs, A.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 25 (2000) (“The burden to act as a parent rests with the parent, who should assert his legal rights at the first and every opportunity.”).
Matthew F. v. Gabrielle N., R.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew F. v. Gabrielle N., R.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Leah M. v. Dcs, K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Leah M. v. Dcs, K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Nathan T. v. Dcs, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Krystle M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Nathan T. v. Dcs, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 41 (2005); ¶ 12 (2000).
Krystle M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 8-533(B)(4); ¶ 28 (2000).
Darrell S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Darrell S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Trung N. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Trung N. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Aragon v. Eulate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Aragon v. Eulate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 11 (2000)), Father presents a debatable issue regarding whether the trial court complied with due process, protective order procedure, and Arizona statutes, see Savord, 235 Ariz. at 259-60, ¶ 16 (confirming that due process protections apply to protective order proceedings).
Jaime Q. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jaime Q. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michael M. v. Anita P., M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michael M. v. Anita P., M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Wiley A. v. Dcs, K.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Wiley A. v. Dcs, K.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Christopher H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Christopher H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Desiree A., Donovan J. v. Dcs, D.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Desiree A., Donovan J. v. Dcs, D.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Trisha A. v. Department of Child safety/l.A./l.A. 446 P.3d 380 Ariz. 2019
Trisha A. v. Department of Child safety/l.A./l.A. 446 P.3d 380 Ariz. 2019
248-49 ¶ 12, , 684-85 (2000).
Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michael F. v. Ashley B., O.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019