Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1269 citing documents.

Michael F. v. Ashley B., O.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Megan E. v. Dcs, H.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Megan E. v. Dcs, H.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sharece N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sharece N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 20 (2000), and “we will not reverse a termination order for insufficient evidence unless, as a matter of law, no reasonable fact-finder could have found the evidence satisfied the applicable burden of proof,” ¶ 6 (App. 2016) (citation omitted).
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 27 (2000), and Maricopa Cty.
Brandon H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Brandon H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -52, ¶ 29 (2000), the juvenile court found DCS had proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination of Father’s parental rights was warranted on the grounds of his incarceration.
Kristin B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Kristin B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fernando M. v. Dcs, C.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Neil B. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Neil B. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fernando M. v. Dcs, C.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Breige H. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Breige H. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and proof by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the best interests of the child.
Kathryn v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Kathryn v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
David v. v. Steve v. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
David v. v. Steve v. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 22 2 We cite to the current version of any statute unless the statute was amended after the pertinent events and such amendment would affect the result of this appeal.
Casha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Casha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 32 (2000); In re Pima Cty.
Karla M. v. Larry J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Karla M. v. Larry J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A.R. v. Dcs, Jessica S. 439 P.3d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A.R. v. Dcs, Jessica S. 439 P.3d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rick R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rick R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Travis H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Travis H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Anthony L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jesus R., Deanna C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jesus R., Deanna C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., regarding the length of his incarceration as well as the court’s best interest determination.
Anthony L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Delcia F. v. Dcs, Z.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Delcia F. v. Dcs, Z.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ramiro A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ramiro A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Robert O. v. Mary B., A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Monique H. v. Dcs, Et El. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Monique H. v. Dcs, Et El. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Robert O. v. Mary B., A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the child’s best interests, Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 284, ¶ 22.
Lessie N., James D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lessie N., James D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa T. v. Dcs, P.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fatuma H. v. Dcs, P.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fatuma H. v. Dcs, P.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa T. v. Dcs, P.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Darrin v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019