Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1269 citing documents.

Darrin v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 27 (2000) (finding that if sufficient evidence supports the juvenile court’s order terminating a parent’s rights on any one of the statutory grounds, this Court need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds).
Ray M. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ray M. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., but “[b]y itself, the length of a parent’s sentence is not dispositive,” Jesus M., 203 Ariz. at 281, ¶ 9.
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 27 (2000), and Maricopa Cty.
A.L. v. J.B. G.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
A.L. v. J.B. G.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
DISCUSSION ¶6 We have long recognized “that the right to the control and custody of one’s children is a fundamental one.” ¶ 11 (2000) (quoting Maricopa County Juv.
Alissa M. v. Dcs, B.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alissa M. v. Dcs, B.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lionel M. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lionel M. v. Dcs, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49, ¶ 12 (2000), and by a preponderance of the evidence that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 24 (2005).
Raquel C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Raquel C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000); ¶ 22 (2005).
Manuel T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Manuel T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 20 (2000), and Jennifer B. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jennifer S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Aleise H. v. Dcs 432 P.3d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11-12 (2000).
Aleise H. v. Dcs 432 P.3d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nathan B. v. Lana T., J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nathan B. v. Lana T., J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ricardo R. v. Lori C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ricardo R. v. Lori C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Martina M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Martina M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shanna A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicole L. v. Dcs, N.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ryan D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ryan D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -52, ¶ 29 (2000)).
Nicole L. v. Dcs, N.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shanna A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shirley R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shirley R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Seth M. v. Arienne M. 426 P.3d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Seth M. v. Arienne M. 426 P.3d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Megan M. v. Matthew M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Megan M. v. Matthew M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Summyr K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jeremy E. v. Dcs, J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jeremy E. v. Dcs, J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49 ¶¶ 11-12 (2000).
Summyr K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and that termination is in the children’s best interests by a preponderance of the evidence, ¶ 41 (2005).
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -49 ¶¶ 11-12 (2000).
Vincent G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018